Coastal Bldg. Corp. v. City of Seattle

Decision Date09 September 1992
CitationCoastal Bldg. Corp. v. City of Seattle, 838 P.2d 690, 119 Wn.2d 1024 (Wash. 1992)
CourtWashington Supreme Court
PartiesCoastal Building Corporation, Hanauer (Lenore M.) v. City of Seattle, Office of Hearing Examiner, Anderson (Baile), Anderson (Betty), Hartwell (Allen), Smith (Gary, Ann), Ochiltree (Ed, Mayo), Doe (John, Jane) NO. 59286-1

Petition For Review: Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • PERRIN v. STENSLAND
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • November 10, 2010
    ... ... Goodfriend, Edwards Sieh Smith & Goodfriend, Seattle, WA, Donald W. Cater, Carter & Fulton, Everett, WA, for ... Wash. State Physicians Ins. Exch. & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp"., 122 Wash.2d 299, 339, 858 P.2d 1054 (1993).       \xC2" ... City of Olympia, 96 Wash.2d 359, 368, 635 P.2d 721 (1981), ... was the result of inexcusable neglect.”); Coastal Bldg. Corp. v. City of Seattle, 65 Wash.App. 1, 6 n. 6, ... ...
  • Cohoon v. Cuny, No. 37987-2-II (Wash. App. 4/13/2010)
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • April 13, 2010
    ... ... Landmark Dev., Inc. v. City of Roy, 138 Wn.2d 561, 573, 980 P.2d 1234 (1999) ... party to inconsistent or multiple liability." Coastal Bldg. Corp. v. City of Seattle, 65 Wn. App. 1, 5, 828 P.2d ... ...
  • National Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Seattle
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • May 13, 1996
    ... ... party's interest or subject any existing party to inconsistent or multiple liability." Coastal Bldg. Corp. v. City of Seattle, 65 Wash.App. 1, 5, 828 P.2d 7, review denied, 119 Wash.2d 1024, 838 ... ...
  • Woodfield v. Graziano
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • November 9, 2009
    ... ... Envtl. Research & Dev. Corp., 112 Wash.2d 323, 333, 771 P.2d 340 (1989) ("[RAP 12.1(b)] ... party to inconsistent or multiple liability." Coastal Bldg. Corp. v. City of Seattle, 65 Wash.App. 1, 5, 828 P.2d ... ...
5 books & journal articles
  • §19.7 Significant Authorities
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 19 Rule 19.Joinder of Persons Needed for Just Adjudication
    • Invalid date
    ...make a neighboring landowner an indispensable party. Coastal Bldg. Corp. v. City of Seattle, 65 Wn.App. 1, 8, 828 P.2d 7, review denied, 119 Wn.2d 1024 (1992). Neighboring landowners, however, are not necessary parties to a property owner's appeal from an order denying the owner's request f......
  • §15.6 Analysis
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 15 Rule 15.Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
    • Invalid date
    ...... exception to 'relation back' ...." Coastal Bldg. Corp. v. City of Seattle, 65 Wn.App. 1, 6 n.6, 828 P.2d 7 (1992), review denied, 119 Wn.2d 1024 (1992). The term originated in North Street Ass'n, 96 Wn.2d at "Inexcusable neglect exists when no reason for the initial failure to name the ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...54 Wn.2d 198, 339 P.2d 82 (1959): 17.6(3)(f), 17.7(5)(f) Coastal Bldg. Corp. v. City of Seattle, 65 Wn.App. 1, 828 P.2d 7, review denied, 119 Wn.2d 1024 (1992): 12.6(2)(g), 15.6(4)(d), 15.7(9)(d), 19.6(1)(b), 19.6(2), 19.7(24) Coburn v. Seda, 101 Wn.2d 270, 677 P.2d 173 (1984): 26.6(2)(a), ......
  • §19.6 Analysis
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 19 Rule 19.Joinder of Persons Needed for Just Adjudication
    • Invalid date
    ...to be impossible due to actions of the plaintiff. Coastal Building Corp. v. City of Seattle, 65 Wn.App. 1, 6, 828 P.2d 7, review denied, 119 Wn.2d 1024 (1992). A property owner challenged a municipality's conclusion that a lot was not a legal building site because neighboring landowners had......
  • Get Started for Free