Cobell v. Norton, CIV.A. 96-1285 RCL.

Decision Date03 March 2003
Docket NumberNo. CIV.A. 96-1285 RCL.,CIV.A. 96-1285 RCL.
Citation246 F.Supp.2d 59
PartiesElouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Columbia

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Jin v. Ministry of State Security
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • June 3, 2008
    ...brief). It is solely within the court's discretion to determine "the fact, extent, and manner" of the participation. Cobell v. Norton, 246 F.Supp.2d 59, 62 (D.D.C.2003). While no rule requires that an amicus be impartial, the court does consider the presence of partiality with regard to an ......
  • Ngv Gaming, Ltd. v. Upstream Point Molate, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • January 31, 2005
    ...or perspective that can help the court beyond the help that the lawyers for the parties are able to provide." Cobell v. Norton, 246 F.Supp.2d 59, 62 (D.D.C.2003) (quoting Ryan v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 125 F.3d 1062, 1064 (7th While the Tribe has not been named a party in this ac......
  • Missouri v. Harris
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • June 30, 2014
    ...Cal. 2005); Sonoma Falls Developers, LLC v. Nev. Gold & Casinos, Inc., 272 F. Supp. 2d 919, 925 (N.D. Cal. 2003); Cobell v. Norton, 246 F. Supp. 2d 59, 62 (D.D.C. 2003). There is no indication Amici I are seeking to control the litigation or the present parties are "mere strawmen" to confer......
  • Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Goldmark
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • October 21, 2013
    ...to provide.'" NGV Gaming, Ltd. v. Upstream Point Molate, LLC, 355 F. Supp. 2d 1061, 1067 (N.D. Cal. 2005) (quoting Cobell v. Norton, 246 F. Supp. 2d 59, 62 (D.D.C. 2003) and Ryan v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 125 F.3d 1062, 1064 (7th Cir. 1997)). The court has "broad discretion" to a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT