Coble v. Dick

CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtCLARKSON, J.
CitationCoble v. Dick, 194 N.C. 732, 140 S.E. 745 (N.C. 1927)
Decision Date21 December 1927
Docket Number336-B.
PartiesCOBLE v. DICK.

Appeal from Superior Court, Alamance County; Barnhill, Judge.

Action by John M. Coble against J. T. Dick. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

The following is agreed statement of facts:

"First. That the plaintiff, John M. Coble, purchased from the defendant, J. T. Dick, a building lot in the town of Mebane, N. C., on the 31st day of March, 1924, and the defendant executed to the said John M. Coble deed for a consideration, said deed containing full covenants and warranties against all incumbrances whatsoever.

Second. That prior to the execution of the aforesaid deed, street and sidewalk assessments had been legally and regularly levied against the property conveyed in said deed. That annual installments for a 10-year period had been authorized by the city of Mebane. That said installments were $23.46 each, plus interest computed annually.

Third. That the installment of January 15, 1924, was paid by the defendant, and since that time the plaintiff has paid the sum of $67.34, and this action is brought for the recovery of the sum of $67.34, the amount plaintiff has already paid on said assessment. That plaintiff's cause of action is based upon the warranties contained in said deed against all incumbrances.

Fourth. That the assessment roll went into effect on the 15th day of July, 1922, and that all annual installments accruing prior to the date of said conveyance had been paid by the defendant, J. T. Dick.

Fifth. That the assessment was made by the town of Mebane, N. C under the act of the Legislature of North Carolina, known as 'Local Improvement Statutes' and under municipal finance acts as set forth in chapter 56 of the Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, and was regularly and properly made.

Sixth. It is agreed that the entire question is whether such assessment is an incumbrance as contemplated or included in the warranty."

The judgment, in part, is as follows:

"The court being of the opinion that the street assessment lien set out in said agreed statement of facts constitutes an incumbrance within the meaning of the warranty clause in said deed from the defendant to the plaintiff, it is ordered, considered, and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, J. T. Dick, the sum of $67.34 together with interest," etc.

Thos. C. Carter, of Mebane, for appellant.

John J. Henderson, of Graham, for appellee.

CLARKSON J.

C. S. § 2713, in part, is as follows:

"Whenever the governing body shall confirm an assessment for a local improvement, the clerk of the municipality shall enter on the minutes of the governing body the date, hour, and minute of such confirmation, and from the time of such confirmation the assessments embraced in the assessment roll shall be a lien on the real property against which the same are assessed, superior to all other liens and incumbrances." (Italics ours.)

C. S. § 2716, provides that payment of assessment can be in cash or by installments.

C. S. §...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • City of Raleigh v. Mechanics & Farmers Bank
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1943
    ... ... Asheville, 154 ... N.C. 40, 69 S.E. 681, holding the assessment had the effect ... of a judgment and lien, and Coble v. Dick, 194 N.C ... 732, 140 S.E. 745, likening the assessment to a statutory ... mortgage, and in view of the local statutes prescribing for ... ...
  • Town of Saluda v. Polk County
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 10, 1934
    ...S. §§ 3462, 3463." Hahn v. Fletcher, 189 N.C. 729, 731, 128 S.E. 326; Farrow v. Insurance Co., 192 N.C. 148, 134 S.E. 427; Coble v. Dick, 194 N.C. 732, 140 S.E. 745. Carawan v. Barnett, 197 N.C. 511, 149 S.E. 740, it is held an assessment made upon adjoining land for a street improvement by......