Cochran v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10501.

Decision Date27 April 1943
Docket NumberNo. 10501.,10501.
Citation135 F.2d 45
PartiesCOCHRAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Geo. E. H. Goodner and Scott P. Crampton, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Joseph M. Jones, Sewall Key, Helen R. Carloss, and S. Dee Hanson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, and Bernard D. Daniels, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before SIBLEY, McCORD, and WALLER, Circuit Judges.

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

S. H. Cochran petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining income tax deficiencies assessed against him for the years 1936 and 1937 in the aggregate sum of $5,982.01.

The question for decision is whether commissions received by the taxpayer in 1936 and 1937 for services as Land Agent for Mobile County, Alabama, are exempt from income tax under the provisions of the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939, 26 U. S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code § 22(a), which extended tax immunity for the years in question to amounts received as "compensation * * * as an officer or employee of a State, or any political subdivision thereof". The Board found that Cochran was an independent contractor and therefore taxable on the commissions under Section 22 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C. A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 825.

Whether a taxpayer's relationship to a State or political subdivision is that of an officer or employee or that of an independent contractor depends upon the facts of the particular case. Register v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 69 F.2d 607, 93 A.L.R. 186.

On October 1, 1935, Henry S. Long, State Land Commissioner of Alabama, with approval of the Governor appointed S. H. Cochran "Land Agent for Mobile County" and fixed his commission at ten per cent "on all sales, redemptions, rentals, etc., on all transactions in connection with real estate sold for taxes and bid in for the State". Cochran accepted and shortly thereafter executed a surety bond and took an oath of office before the State Land Commissioner. He was furnished an office in the County Court House at Mobile. Thereafter Cochran continued to supervise three businesses which he owned in Mobile County, but devoted the major portion of his time to activities as Land Agent, and in this connection employed and paid assistants to help him in the work. During 1936 and 1937 he secured redemptions of lands sold for taxes, and with the authorization and approval of the State Land Commissioner compromised tax liabilities. On all rentals, sales, and redemptions he received the agreed ten per cent commission, which commissions amounted to $24,991.31 in 1936, and $12,230.14 in 1937.

The State Land Commissioner required Cochran to furnish him a monthly report of "all money received from rents, land redemptions, and any form of money or taxes received from lands that come under the head and responsibility of the State Land Commissioner, and is submitted to the Judge of Probate. We would like a copy of the record that you send to the Judge of Probate".

By Act approved September 13, 1935, Gen.Acts Ala.1935, pp. 916, 917, the Legislature of Alabama provided:

"Section 1. The State Land Commissioner, with the approval of the Governor, may contract with some person or firm in each county of this State to investigate sales of real property for taxes and bid in for the State, to notify parties at interest in such real estate of such sales, to secure redemptions of said property, to secure sales of said property subject to sale at private sale by the State.

"Section 2. For such services rendered under the preceding section, the ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Pope v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 6 Diciembre 1943
    ...Revenue, 3 Cir., 81 F.2d 626; Register v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 69 F.2d 607, 93 A.L.R. 186; Cochran v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 135 F.2d 45; Campbell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 7 Cir., 87 F.2d 128; Haight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 7 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT