Coe v. City of San Diego
| Docket Number | D068814 |
| Decision Date | 28 September 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
10 cases
-
Mercury Ins. Co. v. Lara
...showed no inclination to change its conduct to comply with the statute. Thus, Walsh does not apply. ( Coe v. City of San Diego (2016) 3 Cal.App.5th 772, 786, 208 Cal.Rptr.3d 73 [plaintiff "repeatedly warned ... of the violations ... and of her need to take corrective action"].) Even after a......
-
People v. Windfield
... ... Other information 5 led to an apartment complex in the city in Colorado 6 where Nikki's mother and sister lived. Two weeks before the hearing, the case agent contacted the police in that city and they went to ... ...
-
People v. Hall
...observations of a public employee who had a duty to observe facts and report and record them correctly"]; Coe v. City of San Diego (2016) 3 Cal.App.5th 772, 786-788, 208 Cal.Rptr.3d 73 [police reports admissible under official records exception].)Appellant asserts, "In [ People v. ] Sanchez......
-
Oxford Preparatory Acad. v. Chino Valley Unified Sch. Dist.
...license or business permit, which courts have consistently held to affect a fundamental right. (See, e.g., Coe v. City of San Diego (2016) 3 Cal.App.5th 772, 787, 208 Cal.Rptr.3d 73 [decision to revoke business permit]; Goat Hill Tavern v. City of Costa Mesa (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1519, 1529,......
Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
-
Governmental documents
...contain facts, opinions, or both, are admissible under the public records and reports exception to hearsay rule. Coe v. San Diego , 3 Cal.App.5th 772, 208 Cal.Rptr.3d 73 (California Court of Appeal, 2016). In a nude entertainment business owner’s petition for a writ of administrative mandat......
-
Governmental Documents
...contain facts, opinions, or both, are admissible under the public records and reports exception to hearsay rule. Coe v. San Diego , 3 Cal.App.5th 772, 208 Cal.Rptr.3d 73 (California Court of Appeal, 2016). In a nude entertainment business owner’s petition for a writ of administrative mandat......
-
Table of cases
...§8:10 Coddington, People v. (2000) 23 Cal. 4th 529, 97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 528, §§5:80, 21:30, 21:70, 22:240 Coe v. City of San Diego (2016) 3 Cal. App. 5th 772, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 73, §9:160 Coffman and Marlow, People v. (2004) 34 Cal. 4th 1, 17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 710, §§1:70, 4:160, 9:60, 9:100, 10:6......
-
Governmental Documents
...contain facts, opinions, or both, are admissible under the public records and reports exception to hearsay rule. Coe v. San Diego , 3 Cal.App.5th 772, 208 Cal.Rptr.3d 73 (California Court of Appeal, 2016). In a nude entertainment business owner’s petition for a writ of administrative mandat......
Get Started for Free