Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. State of Idaho

Decision Date06 April 1995
Docket NumberNo. 94-35238,94-35238
Citation51 F.3d 876
PartiesCOEUR D'ALENE TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Nez Perce Tribe, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF IDAHO, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Raymond C. Givens, Givens, Funke & Work, Coeur d'Alene, ID, for plaintiff-appellant.

David G. High, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, ID, for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho; Harold L. Ryan, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasoning advanced in its published opinion, 842 F.Supp. 1268 (Idaho 1994). Our affirmation also is based, in part, on our holding in Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson, 41 F.3d 421 (9th Cir.1994).

In Rumsey, we held that the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. Sec. 2710(d)(1)(B), permits Class III gaming activities on Indian lands "only if such activities are ... located in a State that permits such gaming for any purpose...." Id. at 425. Thus, we concluded that where a state does not permit gaming activities sought by a tribe, "the tribe has no right to engage in those activities, and the state ... has no duty to negotiate with respect to them." Id. In so concluding, we cited with approval Judge Ryan's well-reasoned opinion in the instant case. Id. at 427.

Because Idaho does not permit Class III gaming activities, we hold that the Coeur D'Alene Tribe has no right to engage in those activities.

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Confed. Tribes and Bands of Yakama Indian v. Lowry
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Washington
    • December 19, 1996
    ... ... YAKAMA INDIAN NATION, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe, Plaintiff, ... Mike LOWRY, in His Official Capacity as vernor of the State of Washington, and the State of Washington, a State of the ...         In Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. State of Idaho, 842 F.Supp. 1268, 1282 ... ...
  • Flynt v. California Gambling Control Com.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 26, 2002
    ... ...         Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney ... at p. 216, 107 S.Ct. 1083.) Acknowledging the tribe's interest in raising revenues and the efforts of the ... (§ 2710(d); see also Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. State (D.Idaho 1994) 842 F.Supp. 1268, ... ...
  • Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. Doyle, 2003AP421.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • July 14, 2006
    ... ... DOYLE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, and Stephen E. Bablitch, in his official ... , on behalf of Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians; Kris M. Goodwill and Lac Courte ... forms of gaming not otherwise legal in state); Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Idaho, 842 F.Supp. 1268, aff'd, 51 F.3d ... ...
  • Panzer v. Doyle
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • May 13, 2004
    ... ... Nowak, legal counsel state assembly/speaker's office, Stephen L. Morgan and Murphy ... Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin, Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Bad River Band of Lake Superior ... parties have stipulated that Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, and Mississippi all have such ... forms of gaming not otherwise legal in state); Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Idaho, 842 F. Supp. 1268, affirmed, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT