Cohen v. Elm City Mfg. Co.
Citation | 40 A. 455,70 Conn. 505 |
Parties | COHEN v. ELM CITY MFG. CO. et al. |
Decision Date | 01 June 1898 |
Court | Supreme Court of Connecticut |
Appeal from common pleas court New Haven county; John P. Studley, Judge.
Replevin by Nathan Cohen against the Elm City Manufacturing Company and others. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
The complaint alleged that ever since the 9th day of July, 1897, the defendants August L. Schneider, doing business under the name of the Elm City Manufacturing Company, and Peter J. McNerney, had unlawfully detained from the plaintiff one soda water fountain, one ice cream machine, eleven ice cream cans, and fourteen ice cream tubs, of the value of $150, the property of the plaintiff, and of which the plaintiff on said day was, and ever since has been, entitled to the immediate possession. The answer was a general denial and a special answer, alleging in substance that on the 8th day of July, 1897, Michael Tovorovsky, of New Haven, was indebted to August L. Schneider, one of the defendants, in the sum of $79.95; that on said day the other defendant, McNerney, a constable of New Haven, under a writ which Schneider had caused to be issued against said Tovorovsky for the purpose of collecting said debt, attached said goods; that they were replevied by the plaintiff while so held under attachment; that said goods were the property of Tovorovsky at the time of the attachment, and not of the present plaintiff, Cohen; but that Cohen, conspiring and agreeing with his son-in-law, Tovorovsky, to defraud the said Schneider, and prevent him from collecting his said debt, now claims to be the owner of said goods so attached. The plaintiff's reply denied the allegations of the special answer that Tovorovsky was indebted to Schneider; that the goods belonged to Tovorovsky at the time of the attachment; and that Cohen and Tovorovsky had entered into an agreement for the purpose of defrauding Schneider.
In presenting his case in chief, the following instruments, which were marked, respectively, Plaintiff's Exhibits A and B, were offered and received with evidence that both said instruments were executed and delivered on the 24th of June, 1897, as parts of one transaction, and that Exhibit B was witnessed and duly acknowledged and recorded on the 25th of June, 1897:
The only witnesses called for the plaintiff were the plaintiff, Nathan Cohen, and his son-in-law, the said Michael Tovorovsky. These witnesses testified that the consideration of the sale to the plaintiff was a previous indebtedness of Tovorovsky to Cohen of $25, and $100 in cash paid by Cohen to Tovorovsky on the day of the transaction; that the goods were in the cellar of the building where Tovorovsky carried on the ice-cream and soda-water business; and that the plaintiff there examined them; and that, after the execution of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Trachten v. Boyarsky
... ... still belonging to the latter. Cohen v. Schneider, ... 70 Conn. 505, 40 A. 455; Spencer v. Broughton, 77 ... Conn. 38, 58 A. 236; ... ...
-
Collins v. Lewis
... ... 570, 65 A. 973; Smith v. Gilbert, 71 Conn. 149, 154, ... 41 A. 284, 71 Am.St.Rep. 163; Cohen v. Schneider, 70 ... Conn. 505, 40 A. 455 ... By ... this means the creditor obtained ... ...
-
Terzano v. Clemente
... ... property by one purporting to sell it. Cohen v ... Schneider, 70 Conn. 505, 510, 40 A. 455; Spencer v ... Broughton, 77 Conn. 38, 41, 58 A ... ...
-
Adler v. Ammerman Furniture Co.
... ... absolute sales as to creditors and bona fide purchasers of ... the vendee." Cohen v. Schneider et al., 70 ... Conn. 505, 40 A. 455 ... Exhibit A was made, ... ...