Cohen v. Plateau Natural Gas Company, 6713.

Decision Date01 May 1962
Docket NumberNo. 6713.,6713.
Citation303 F.2d 273
PartiesWilliam I. COHEN, Appellant, v. PLATEAU NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Drillers Gas Company, Paul Kitch and Vulcan Materials Company, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

David M. Palley, New York City, for appellant.

Richard F. Mullins, Wichita, Kan., for appellee, Plateau Natural Gas Co. and Drillers Gas Co.

Frank H. McFadden, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee, Vulcan Materials Co.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered against Appellant in his stockholders' derivative action against Appellees.

Upon the filing of the notice of appeal, Appellees moved for dismissal on the ground that the notice was untimely. We denied the motion without prejudice to renewal at time of argument on the merits.

The summary judgment was entered on January 11, 1961. The record shows that a copy of the journal entry of judgment was received by Appellant's local counsel of record in Wichita, Kansas forthwith, and the records of the District Court Clerk show that notice and copies of the journal entry of judgment were mailed to all of the attorneys of record, including David M. Palley, Appellant's chief counsel in New York City, New York. No attempt to appeal was made by Appellant within the thirty-day period provided by Rule 73(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. but on March 8, 1961, after the time for appeal had expired, Mr. Palley filed an affidavit asking the trial court to extend the time for appeal on the ground that he had not received notice of the entry of judgment. On that date, the trial court issued an ex parte order extending the time to appeal for thirty days and Appellant's notice of appeal was filed within the extended time. Appellees' motion in the trial court to set aside the order extending the time to appeal was denied on the basis that the filing of the notice of appeal had divested that Court's jurisdiction.

Under these circumstances, it is extremely doubtful whether, as a matter of law, the "excusable neglect" contemplated by Rule 73(a) was present. See: Nichols-Morris Corporation v. Morris, 2 Cir., 279 F.2d 81. In any event, since the motion in the form of an affidavit for an extension of time in which to appeal was not made within the initial thirty days allowed by Rule 73 (a), the trial court was without power to act without giving notice to all adverse parties. See: Rules 6(b), (d),...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Diffenderfer v. Homer
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 10 Marzo 1969
    ...8 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 247. See also Plant Economy, Inc. v. Mirror Insulation Co., 3 Cir., 1962, 308 F.2d 275; Cohen v. Plateau Natural Gas Co., 10 Cir., 1962, 303 F.2d 273, cert. denied, 1962, 371 U.S. 825, 83 S.Ct. 45, 9 L.Ed.2d 64; North Umberland Mining Co. v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.......
  • Winchell v. Lortscher
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 22 Mayo 1967
    ...parte an extension of time for appeal but must give notice and opportunity to be heard to all adverse parties. Cohen v. Plateau Natural Gas Co., 10 Cir., 1962, 303 F.2d 273, 274, certiorari denied, 371 U.S. 825, 83 S.Ct. 45, 9 L.Ed.2d 64; North Umberland Mining Co. v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.......
  • Kings Professional Basketball Club, Inc. v. Green, 84-0182-CV-W-1.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • 14 Noviembre 1984
    ...a prospective appellant with the duty to keep himself apprised as to the status of his case" and that the same court in Cohen v. Plateau Natural Gas Co., supra, had "indicated that the fact that `chief' counsel had not received notice from the clerk did not, as a matter of law, make out a c......
  • Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Kurtenbach, 75--1002
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 30 Diciembre 1975
    ...by Rule 4(a), F.R.App.P., the trial court is without power to act without giving notice to all adverse parties. Cohen v. Plateau Natural Gas Co., 303 F.2d 273 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 825, 83 S.Ct. 45, 9 L.Ed.2d 64; Plant Economy, Inc. v. Mirror Insulation Co., 308 F.2d 275 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 provisions
  • 28 APPENDIX U.S.C. § 4 Appeal As of Right-When Taken
    • United States
    • US Code 2020 Edition Title 28 Appendix Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Title II. Appeal From a Judgment Or Order of a District Court
    • 1 Enero 2020
    ...73(a) and 6(b). North Umberland Mining Co. v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., 193 F.2d 951 (9th Cir., 1952); Cohen v. Plateau Natural Gas Co., 303 F.2d 273 (10th Cir., 1962); Plant Economy, Inc. v. Mirror Insulation Co., 308 F.2d 275 (3d Cir., 1962).Since this subdivision governs appeals in all......
  • 28 APPENDIX U.S.C. § 4 Appeal As of Right-When Taken
    • United States
    • US Code 2023 Edition Title 28 Appendix Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Title II. Appeal From a Judgment Or Order of a District Court
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...73(a) and 6(b). North Umberland Mining Co. v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., 193 F.2d 951 (9th Cir., 1952); Cohen v. Plateau Natural Gas Co., 303 F.2d 273 (10th Cir., 1962); Plant Economy, Inc. v. Mirror Insulation Co., 308 F.2d 275 (3d Cir., 1962).Since this subdivision governs appeals in all......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT