Cohn v. State Tax Commission
Decision Date | 18 May 1926 |
Citation | 118 Or. 92,245 P. 1085 |
Parties | COHN v. STATE TAX COMMISSION. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Department 1.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; Robert Tucker, Judge.
Proceeding under Laws 1925, p. 632, §§ 30, 31, by A. Cohn against the State Tax Commission. Judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings, and defendant appeals. Appeal dismissed.
Miles H. McKey, of Salem (I. H. Van Winkle, Atty Gen., on the brief), for appellant.
Charles S. Cohn, of Portland, for respondent.
The plaintiff made his individual income tax return for the year 1923, in which he deducted $20,000 which he paid during that year on some notes which he had given in the preceding year in settlement of an action brought against him to recover damages. The defendant tax commission refused to allow the deduction, and levied upon him an additional tax. He seeks to recover this with interest.
Having applied to the commission for a revision, which was denied he has brought this proceeding under sections 30 and 31 of chapter 316 of the General Laws of Oregon for 1925, reading thus:
Dissatisfied with the decision of the circuit court in favor of the plaintiff on his motion for judgment on the pleadings, the commission has appealed.
The scheme for levying a tax on income, as embodied in the statute under consideration, is complete within itself. The only provision for questioning the determination of the tax commission is prescribed in section 31 to the effect that it may be "reviewed in any court of competent jurisdiction by a complaint." There is no provision for an appeal. As said by Mr. Justice Bean in Portland v White, 106 Or. 169, 211 P. 798:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Inland Nav. Co. v. Chambers
...need not provide for an additional hearing in its courts: 42 Am.Jur., Public Administrative Law, § 137, p. 479. In Cohn v. State Tax Commission, 118 Or. 92, 245 P. 1085, this court said: 'Appeals are not allowed as a matter of right, but only in pursuance of, and to the extent as provided b......
-
Sahnow v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
...234 Or. 66, 70, 380 P.2d 111 (1963); Inland Nav. Co. v. Chambers et al., 202 Or. 339, 350, 274 P.2d 104 (1954); Cohn v. State Tax Commission, 118 Or. 92, 95, 245 P. 1085 (1926). In Inland Nav. Co. v. Chambers it was held that the circuit court's power of review in tax assessment cases was l......
-
Earle v. Holman
...55 P.2d 1097 154 Or. 578 EARLE, State Insurance Com'r, v. HOLMAN, State Treasurer, et al. Supreme Court of OregonMarch 31, 1936 ... statutes of the state." ... Cohn v. State Tax Commission, 118 Or. 92, 245 P ... 1085, also cited, holds that the statute ... ...
-
Timoney v. McIntire
... ... In that ... case, a quotation is made from the case of State v ... Security Savings Co., 28 Or. 410, 43 P. 162, as follows: ... "The law, as we ... So also ... in Cohn v. State Tax Commission, 118 Or. 92, 245 P ... 1085, as the reason for dismissing an appeal ... ...