Colbert v. R.I. Co.
Decision Date | 20 April 1906 |
Citation | 67 A. 446 |
Parties | COLBERT v. RHODE ISLAND CO. |
Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
Exceptions from Superior Court Providence County.
Action by Minnie F. Colbert against the Rhode Island Company. Verdict for plaintiff.
Defendant brings exceptions. New trial granted, and case remitted for further proceedings.
Comstock & Canning, for plaintiff. Henry W. Hayes, Frank T. Easton, Lefferts Hoffman, and Alonzo R. Williams, for defendant.
The defendant's exceptions relating to the introduction of the "life tables" and to the refusal of the court to charge "that the jury cannot consider specific trouble with the plaintiff's heart as an element of damage in this case" must be sustained. Life tables are not admissible in the case of abnormal individuals or persons suffering from incurable diseases. The declaration contains no averment of heart injury, and proof thereof was therefore inadmissible. Special damages must be specially alleged. McGregor v. R. I. Co., 27 R. I. 85, 60 Atl. 761. The court should have given the instruction, although evidence relating to heart disease had been admitted without seasonable objection. The testimony shows that the affection of the heart, if any exists, is not a necessary consequence of the injuries complained of in the declaration. For these reasons a new trial must be granted.
Case remitted to the superior court for further proceedings.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mississippi Cotton Oil Co. v. Smith
...15 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law, p. 881; Railroad Co. v. Crudup, 63 Miss. 303; Telephone Co. v. Anderson, 89 Miss. 745, 41 So. 263; Colbert v. Railroad Co., 67 A. 446; Railway v. Berry, 102 S.W. 89; Foster v. Railroad Co., 72 Miss. 886; Kamerick v. Castleman, 21 Mo.App. 587; Bernheim v. Dibrell, 66......
-
Mississippi Cotton Oil Co. v. Smith, 13,450
...15 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law, p. 881; Railroad Co. v. Crudup, 63 Miss. 303; Telephone Co. v. Anderson, 89 Miss. 745, 41 So. 263; Colbert v. Railroad Co., 67 A. 446; Railway v. Berry, 102 S.W. 89; Foster v. Railroad Co., 72 Miss. 886; Kamerick v. Castleman, 21 Mo.App. 587; Bernheim v. Dibrell, 66......
- Leeds v. Cetenich