Colby v. Fuller
Decision Date | 30 October 1950 |
Citation | 96 N.H. 323,76 A.2d 509 |
Parties | COLBY v. FULLER, Secretary of State, et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Upton, Sanders & Upton, Concord, (John H. Sanders, Concord), for plaintiff.
Normandin & Normandin, Laconia (Fortunat A. Normandin, Laconia), for defendant Gilman.
C. Murray Sawyer, Concord, for Democratic County Committee.
Gordon M. Tiffany, Attorney General, for remaining defendants.
R.L. c. 33, § 67, Laws 1947, c. 159, § 5, provides: Opposing counsel are in general agreement that this statute is limited to filling vacancies by party committees only in the event of death and that therefore it does not control the present situation.
The only other pertinent statutory provision is R.L. c. 33, § 52, reading as follows: 'Vacancies.Vacancies upon any party ticket occurring after the holding of any primary shall be filled by the party committee of the state, county, town or ward, as the case may require, and such committee shall file notice of the appointment made with the secretary of state forty days prior to the day of election for all candidates for any office.The number of days herein given shall include Sundays and shall end on the day before election at six o'clock in the afternoon.The names of persons so appointed shall be placed upon the official election ballot.'Vacancies' for the purpose of this section shall mean only those cases where no candidate has filed and where the person whose name has been written in withdraws or refuses to accept the nomination or where the sole candidate filing for the nomination shall be disqualified for any reason.'
The filling of vacancies permitted by this section is limited to appointments made forty days before the election.It is further restricted by limiting vacancies to two specific situations.The first is where no candidate has filed and the person who has received the nomination by a write-in vote withdraws or refuses to accept the nomination.The second is where the sole candidate is disqualified for any reason.It appears from the statement of facts that the present dispute is not within either of the contingencies provided for in this statute.In the present situation there were two candidates and no question of a sole candidate was involved.Furthermore the vacancy was not created by the failure of any candidate to file and the withdrawal of any candidate named.Accordingly there was no vacancy that existed in the present case which the statute permits to be filled by appointment.
The plaintiff argues that this is the type of vacancy which the Legislature has not regulated and therefore is governed by the common law right of party committees to act in the absence of statutory regulation.It is further contended that the statutes regulating the Australian Ballot, the direct primary, the ...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Kibbe v. Town of Milton
...by legislative action and not by judicial decree. See Wilkes, 101 N.H. at 423, 145 A.2d at 170–71; see also Colby v. Fuller, 96 N.H. 323, 326, 76 A.2d 509, 511–12 (1950). The decision of the superior court is reversed, and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.Re......
-
State v. Sullivan
...we are concerned here. State v. Williams, 92 N.H. 377, 378, 31 A.2d 369; Newell v. Moreau, 94 N.H. 439, 443, 55 A.2d 476; Colby v. Fuller, 96 N.H. 323, 325, 76 A.2d 509. The holding in Coutremarsh v. Metcalf, supra, 87 N.H. 127, 175 A. 175, requiring an intent to violate the law was based o......
-
Wilkes v. Jackson
...candidate, this must be accomplished by legislative action and not by judicial decree. This thought was expressed in Colby v. Fuller, 96 N.H. 323, 326, 76 A.2d 509, 511, in the following language: 'There is much to be said for the proposition that no political party should be deprived of a ......