Cole v. United States

Decision Date23 December 1965
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 1560.
Citation249 F. Supp. 7
PartiesHarl COLE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia

D. B. Howe, Howe & Murphy, Tallapoosa, Ga., for plaintiff.

Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Julius M. Hulsey, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for defendant.

SIDNEY O. SMITH, Jr., District Judge.

This is an action for damages brought pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671, et seq., by plaintiff, who, at the time of the alleged injury was a prisoner at the Federal Prison Camp, Maxwell Air Force Base, Montgomery, Alabama.

While thus engaged, plaintiff fell off the rear of a trash truck onto a concrete surface, receiving injuries to his left arm. Plaintiff contends that the government was negligent in the following particulars:

(a) In failing to maintain said truck and said ladder in a safe manner.
(b) In failing to have provided a place on the top of the truck by which plaintiff or others using said ladder could brace themselves.
(c) In failing to provide railings or other safety devices on said ladder to prevent plaintiff or others injury.
(d) By providing plaintiff a dangerous and hazardous location of work and requiring him to work thereon.
(e) By failing to properly inspect said truck and ladder.
(h) By allowing said truck to move forward and then suddenly and without warning, checking its speed by applying the brakes, causing an abrupt cessation of movement of the truck and causing the ladder to violently and suddenly swing under the truck and causing plaintiff to fall to the concrete and causing plaintiff injury as will be hereinafter detailed.
(i) In failing to properly anchor said ladder on said truck.
(j) In failing to use reasonable and legal degree of care toward plaintiff, and in injuring plaintiff.

In addition to the fact and law questions involved on the main issue, there are two collateral questions before the court for decision.

(1) The government, at the close of plaintiff's evidence made a motion for dismissal under Rule 41(b) on the grounds that the evidence showed that the claimant was entitled to compensation under 18 U.S.C.A. § 4126 as an exclusive remedy. This is the same grounds on which the government's motion for summary judgment was denied by Chief Judge Morgan on April 6, 1965.
(2) At pre-trial, it was stipulated in writing that the law of Alabama applies in the case but both parties stipulate the case may be tried as to negligence and damages according to Georgia law.
The government now contends that it was powerless to enter into such a stipulation and that the court must apply Alabama law to the main suit.

The case came on for trial on November 19, 1965, and is now ready for decision.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

On December 7, 1962, Harl C. Cole was sentenced to two years confinement for whiskey violations at Rome, Georgia. He served at Tallahassee, Florida, from January until April, 1963, at which time he was transferred to the Federal Prison Camp located within the confines of the federal reservation known as Maxwell Air Force Base, Montgomery, Alabama. The Camp is located on the opposite side of the landing strip from the main base some two miles by road from the main base. Daily, Monday through Friday, various details of prisoners are transported by truck to the base for the performance of housekeeping chores for the military. Such work is not prison industry nor is it in connection with the maintenance or operation of the institution where confined. Prisoners received no compensation for the work done and are subject to the direction and control of civilian employees of the military base.

Shortly after his arrival at Maxwell, Cole was assigned to the "garbage detail," or more properly, to the Refuse Collection Unit. This is a unit under the direction of a civilian foreman (Milton F. Varner) and is composed of 12 civilians and an average of eight prisoners, who, of course, change from time to time. It has 11 vehicles, including some automatic garbage disposal units. In its equipment are three 1959 Ford 1½ Ton "stake body" trucks, identical in appearance and equipment. At the time under investigation, each "stake" truck had been equipped with solid metal sides approximately 4 feet high affixed to the wooden bed, except at the rear. There was no tail gate in order to facilitate loading and unloading of loose trash, which could not be collected by means of the automatic loaders. At the rear end of the truck bed are four holes, normally used to insert "stakes" when the trucks are used to completely enclose a load.

In those receptacles, the government customarily hung a short step-ladder to facilitate the prisoners climbing into and out of the bed of the truck. At the time in question, these ladders were made with flat angle-iron sides with a hooked top inserted into the truck bed with two wooden treads of 2 × 6's of smooth-planed surface. Because of the "play" between the hooks and the holes, the ladders would easily swing 4-6 inches in each direction, but would not swing completely up under the truck bed because the end of the bed and rear of the chassis would stop the main part of the ladder. Normally, the steps were mounted by the prisoners many times a day during the normal work day (7:30 A.M.-2:30 P.M.) in the course of completing the assigned tasks, and many times they were mounted at the specific direction of supervisors. No hand holds were provided and the only means of maintaining balance was by placing the hands on the end of the sides or the bed of the truck.

From his first days at Maxwell, Cole was assigned to one of these vehicles and had been constantly so engaged up until August 19, 1963, the date of the accident under investigation, which occurred at approximately 2:30 P.M. It had been raining during the day and was "misting" at the time. Upon completion of the day's run, the vehicle was driven by a civilian employee, Tyrus, to the "wash rack" for the purpose of hosing down the vehicle. The "wash rack" is really an asphalt area adjacent to the concrete apron of the air field. Next to the apron are sheds and buildings for maintenance purposes. The wash rack is a shed, attached to a building at right angles, and partially enclosed by a latticed fence on the front and end. Trucks are normally parked at the end, where hose connections are available.

On the day in question, Tyrus drove the truck to a point just off the concrete apron approximately 4 feet from the end of the shed and turned off the engine. Cole dismounted from the back of the truck and another prisoner, Billy Barker, dismounted from the cab, passed in front of the truck to the end of the shed and picked up the hose to begin cleaning the truck. Meanwhile, Tyrus had gotten out from behind the wheel and gone into the building attached to the shed to get a drink of water.

At the time, the entire wash-rack area was wet and the vehicle itself was wet from the previous rains. Located on the truck was a cardboard carton used by the detail to gather leaves and trash. In order to prevent water damage to it, Cole decided to remove it from the truck during the washing. As he started up the ladder, it swung forward and being unable to grip anything, his wet shoes slipped off of the wet treads and he fell on the concrete apron.

In the fall, Cole broke his left wrist and strained his left shoulder. Upon admission to the base hospital, a fracture of the end of the large bone where the hand joins the wrist was set and cast applied. No complaint was made about the shoulder and there was no evidence of any other injury. A "big arm" cast was removed after one month, then a "short arm" cast was applied for two more months, then physical therapy was begun. About that time, Cole was discharged from his sentence. Upon discharge, he was healing satisfactorily and in the opinion of the attending surgeon, well on the way to complete recovery.

Subsequently, he has developed a loss of sensation in the left arm and hand and has a weak grip. This was due to the atrophy of the muscles in his left arm and some ischemic contracture due to the fracture. He has developed arthritis in the left shoulder, but it is uncertain whether this resulted from the injury or not. Presently, his arm movements — rotation, adduction, obduction, etc. — are within the normal ranges. It is the court's finding that he has a 15% disability of the left forearm and hand proximately caused by the injury received in the fall.

The injury was very painful at the time of its occurrence. Since that time, it has continued to cause mild pain. Plaintiff, due to pain, finds it difficult to sleep and uses mild pain-killers, such as aspirin, now.

Prior to confinement, Cole was unable to maintain steady employment because of lack of education and drinking. He had worked spasmodically with used cars, the Highway Department, saw-milling and pulpwooding, but his main occupation has been in his words "making liquor." At times he has earned up to $65.00 per week pulpwooding, but his annual income has never exceeded $2,000.00. He receives a disability payment from nervous conditions as a World War II veteran. He is right handed and uses his right arm more than his left. At the time of the injury complained...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Green v. State, Docket No. 8470
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • February 18, 1971
    ...has been released. The fund does not cover injuries sustained by attacks by either prison guards or other inmates. See: Cole v. United States (1965), D.C., 249 F.Supp. 7; Granade v. United States (C.A.2, 1966), 356 F.2d 837; United States v. Muniz (1963), 374 U.S. 150, 83 S.Ct. 1850, 10 L.E......
  • Etzler v. Dille and McGuire Manufacturing Company
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
    • December 23, 1965
    ... ... DILLE AND McGUIRE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant ... Civ. A. No. 64-C-76-R ... United States District Court W. D. Virginia, Roanoke Division ... November 19, 1965 ... Addenda December ... ...
  • Cohen v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • March 21, 1966
    ...no assumption of risk by a prisoner and there is no contributory negligence here in mitigation or reduction of damages. See Cole v. United States, D.C., 249 F.Supp. 7. It is a marvelous commentary on our legal system that this claim can be prosecuted without regard to plaintiff's standing a......
  • Sturgeon v. Federal Prison Industries, 79-1361
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • November 13, 1979
    ...553 (1973); Wooten v. United States, 437 F.2d 79 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. Cole, 376 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1967), Rev'g 249 F.Supp. 7 (N.D.Ga.1965); Saladino v. Federal Prison Industries, 404 F.Supp. 1054, 1056 (D.Conn.1975) (and cases cited therein); Samurine v. United States, 287 F.S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT