Colebrook Water Co. v. Parsons

Decision Date25 June 1936
CitationColebrook Water Co. v. Parsons, 88 N.H. 217, 186 A. 14 (N.H. 1936)
PartiesCOLEBROOK WATER CO. v. PARSONS et al.
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court

Transferred from Superior Court, Coos County; James, Judge.

Action by the Colebrook Water Company against Cushman H. Parsons and another. The case was transferred on a stipulation.

Judgment for defendants.

Action, involving a contract under seal executed by the plaintiff and Cushman H. Parsons, who is referred to in the opinion as the defendant. The reserved case does not state the form of action or the relationship of the defendants. It is assumed that Eliza H. Parsons, the second defendant, is the wife of Cushman H. Parsons. The material clauses of the contract are as follows:

"This agreement, made the eighth day of March, A. D., 1922, by and between Cushman H. Parsons * * * of the first part, and the Colebrook Water Company * * * of the second part, witnessetn:

"That the said Parsons, in consideration of the covenants on the part of the party of the second part, hereinafter contained, doth covenant and agree to and with the said Colebrook Water Company from the brook known as Parsons Brook, from a point where the water is taken by the Colebrook Water Company at the present time, water to fill a two inch pipe at that point and the right to repairt relace [replace] and maintain the pipe line across the Parsons land to the Colebrook Water Company reservoir, also the well at the brook where the water is taken; and the said Colebrook Water Company, for and in consideration of the covenants on the part of the party of the first part, doth covenant and agree to and with the said Parsons, that they will furnish water free of charge to the said Parsons, in the house in which the said Parsons and his wife now live, the intent and meaning being that this does not include any other property that the said Parsons now owns or hereafter owns, for the life of the said Parsons or his wife as long as the Colebrook Water Company is...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Aldrich v. Charles Beauregard & Sons, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • April 24, 1964
    ...her rights against others, must prevail over other ambiguous language from which a contrary meaning might be drawn. Colebrook Water Co. v. Parsons, 88 N.H. 217, 186 A. 14. It follows that the defendant's motion to dismiss cannot be granted on the grounds that the instruments must be constru......
  • Wilko of Nashua, Inc. v. TAP Realty, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1977
    ...general terms of a contract may be limited by words that state the views and objectives of the parties, Colebrook Water Company v. Parsons, 88 N.H. 217, 186 A. 14 (1936) (per curiam); Woods v. Nashua Mfg. Co., 5 N.H. 467, 473 (1831), when two clear, unambiguous, alternative clauses conflict......
  • Emerson v. Cobb
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1936