Coleman v. Burnett, No. 71-1114.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
Writing for the CourtFAHY, Senior Circuit , and McGOWAN and ROBINSON, Circuit
Citation477 F.2d 1187
Decision Date14 March 1973
Docket NumberNo. 71-1114.
PartiesLawrence D. COLEMAN et al., Appellants, v. The Honorable Arthur L. BURNETT, United States Magistrate for the District of Columbia, et al.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
119 practice notes
  • Ahmad v. Wigen, No. 89-CV-715.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • September 26, 1989
    ...a person of ordinary prudence and caution to conscientiously entertain a reasonable belief of the accused's guilt." Coleman v. Burnett, 477 F.2d 1187, 1202 (D.C.Cir.1973). The primary source of evidence for the probable cause determination is the extradition request, 726 F. Supp. 400 and an......
  • Ellison v. Sachs, Civ. A. No. M-83-4455.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • March 23, 1984
    ...Wolff, 658 F.2d at 455; Glenn, 635 F.2d at 1186-87; Russ, 531 F.Supp. at 496-97; Rhoden, 574 F.Supp. at 64. But see Coleman v. Burnett, 477 F.2d 1187, 1198-1202 (D.C.Cir. 1973). One court has permitted the admission of the transcript of testimony at a motion to suppress hearing. Poland, 659......
  • U.S. v. Kin-Hong, KIN-HONG
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • March 5, 1997
    ...or in part." Fed.R.Crim.P. 5.1(a). This is because a "preliminary hearing is not a minitrial of the issue of guilt," Coleman v. Burnett, 477 F.2d 1187, 1201 (D.C.Cir.1973); rather, "its function is the more limited one of determining whether probable cause exists to hold the accused for tri......
  • Bismullah v. Gates, No. 06-1197.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • February 1, 2008
    ...evidence the prosecution has gathered. The reason, of course, is that the preliminary hearing is limited in scope. Coleman v. Burnett, 477 F.2d 1187, 1201 (D.C.Cir.1973) ("The preliminary hearing is not a minitrial of the issue of guilt, ... `A preliminary hearing,' the Supreme Court has sa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
119 cases
  • Ellison v. Sachs, Civ. A. No. M-83-4455.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • March 23, 1984
    ...Wolff, 658 F.2d at 455; Glenn, 635 F.2d at 1186-87; Russ, 531 F.Supp. at 496-97; Rhoden, 574 F.Supp. at 64. But see Coleman v. Burnett, 477 F.2d 1187, 1198-1202 (D.C.Cir. 1973). One court has permitted the admission of the transcript of testimony at a motion to suppress hearing. Poland, 659......
  • Spatola v. US, No. 89-CV-4056 (JRB)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • July 9, 1990
    ...a person of ordinary prudence and caution to conscientiously entertain a reasonable belief of the accused's guilt.' Coleman v. Burnett, 477 F.2d 1187, 1202 (D.C.Cir.1973)." In re Extradition of Atta, 706 F.Supp. 1032, 1050 (E.D. N.Y.1989). Furthermore, "the primary source of evidence for th......
  • State v. Olson, No. 84-1537-CR
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
    • November 21, 1985
    ...denied, 440 U.S. 918, 99 S.Ct. 1238, 59 L.Ed.2d 469 (1979); Journigan v. Duffy, 552 F.2d 283, 289 (9th Cir.1977); Coleman v. Burnett, 477 F.2d 1187, 1194 n. 20 (D.C.Cir.1973); United States v. Cox, 464 F.2d 937, 940 (6th Cir.1972); United States v. Gonzalez-Parra, 438 F.2d 694, 696 (5th Cir......
  • Texas Border Coalition v. Napolitano, Civil Action No. 08-0848 (RBW).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • May 15, 2009
    ...accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned."); see, e.g., Coleman v. Burnett, 477 F.2d 1187, 1198 (D.C.Cir.1973) (where the Circuit Court "[e]xercis[ed][its] power to judicially notice proceedings in related cases"); Andreen v. Lanie......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT