Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Md.

Docket Number10-1016
Decision Date20 March 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
826 cases
  • In re Terry
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • March 14, 2017
    ...Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals, 626 F.3d 187, 189 (4th Cir. 2010), aff'd sub nom., Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Md., 566 U.S. 30 (2012). The Court must also "draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff." E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Indus., Inc., 637 F.3d 435,......
  • Jordan v. Cnty. of Chemung
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • September 5, 2017
    ...v. Hibbs, 538 U.S. 721, 724–25, 123 S.Ct. 1972, 155 L.Ed.2d 953 (2003). But see Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Md., 566 U.S. 30, 33, 132 S.Ct. 1327, 182 L.Ed.2d 296 (2012) (disallowing money damages suits against states for violations of § 2612(a)(1)(D) ).The regulations promulgated pursuan......
  • Hammons v. Univ. of Md. Med. Sys. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • July 28, 2021
    ...absent consent or a valid congressional abrogation of sovereign immunity. See Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Md. , 566 U.S. 30, 35, 132 S.Ct. 1327, 182 L.Ed.2d 296 (2012) ; Va. Office for Prot. & Advocacy v. Stewart , 563 U.S. 247, 253-54, 131 S.Ct. 1632, 179 L.Ed.2d 675 (2011) ; Passaro v.......
  • Tafoya v. New Mexico
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • February 4, 2021
    ...except where the state choses to waive that immunity. See MTD at 4 (citing Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland, 566 U.S. 30, 132 S. Ct. 1327, 1333, 182 L.Ed.2d 296 (2012) ).The State Defendants contend that, because New Mexico has not waived its sovereign immunity, Tafoya's federal law ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Labor and Employment Observer 2012/2013
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • January 1, 2013
    ...ministers and it only bars employment discrimination lawsuits. Suits Alleging Violation of FMLA Self-Care Leave Provision Not Available to State Employees In Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals, 132 S.Ct. 1327 (March 20, 2012), the Supreme Court ruled a state employer was immune from suit ......
17 books & journal articles
  • HOW CLEARLY DOES CONGRESS NEED TO WAIVE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY? ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE CLEAR STATEMENT RULE.
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Vol. 52 No. 3, June 2022
    • June 22, 2022
    ...546 U.S. 356 (2006) (writing dissent, finding no abrogation of state sovereign immunity for bankruptcy). Coleman v. Md. Ct. of Apps., 566 U.S. 30 (2012) (writing concurrence, finding no abrogation of state sovereign immunity in FMLA and no 14th Amendment power in self-care provision nor in ......
  • Agency Legislative History
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 68-2, 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...(disagreeing that the text is clear and arguing in favor of considering the legislative history); Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Md., 566 U.S. 30, 44-45 (2012) (Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment) (arguing against the plurality's use of legislative history and in favor of considering th......
  • THE MISUNDERSTOOD ELEVENTH AMENDMENT.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 169 No. 3, February 2021
    • February 1, 2021
    ...440-41 (1900) (federally chartered railroad). (23) In re New York, 256 U.S. 490, 497, 500 (1921). (24) E.g., Coleman v. Ct. of Appeals, 566 U.S. 30, 43 (2012) (plurality opinion) (describing Maryland's "Eleventh Amendment immunity from suits"); Pense v. Md. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. ......
  • 4.9 The Family and Medical Leave Act (fmla)
    • United States
    • Virginia CLE The Virginia Lawyer: A Deskbook for Practitioners (Virginia CLE) (2018 Ed.) Chapter 4 Employment Law: Employee Rights and Employer Responsibilities
    • Invalid date
    ...Act are specifically enumerated in 29 U.S.C. § 2617. But see Coleman v. Maryland Ct. of Appeals, 626 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2010), aff'd, 132 S. Ct. 1327 (2012) (when an employee is suing over "self care" leave, there is no abrogation of the Eleventh Amendment for the state's authority).[219] 2......
  • Get Started for Free