Colley v. State

Decision Date28 August 1981
Citation405 So.2d 391
PartiesEx parte State of Alabama, ex rel. Attorney General. (In re Kelly COLLEY v. STATE of Alabama). 79-457.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals, 405 So.2d 374.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals on the authority of Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625, 100 S.Ct. 2382, 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980); Beck v. State, 396 So.2d 645 (Ala.1980); Ritter v. State, 403 So.2d 154 (Ala.1981); and Reed v. State, 407 So.2d 162 (Ala.1981).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Justices concur, except MADDOX, JONES and ADAMS, JJ., who concur specially.

MADDOX, JONES, and ADAMS, Judges (concurring specially):

By concurring specially we adhere to the views expressed in our respective opinions in Ritter v. State, 403 So.2d 154 (Ala.1981), to the effect that we would not reverse the conviction in any case in which the record of trial affirmatively precludes any showing which would entitle the defendant to a jury instruction on a lesser included offense.

Because the per curiam opinion mandates a retrial on the issue of guilt, as well as the issue of sentence, we re-emphasize the proposition that an instruction on a lesser included offense is required "on any lesser included offense supported by the evidence," Beck v. State, 396 So.2d 645, 657 (Ala.1980), but an instruction on a lesser included offense would be appropriate only if there was evidence which would support the giving of such an instruction. Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325, 96 S.Ct. 3001, 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976), Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625, 100 S.Ct. 2382, 2386, 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (footnote 7) (1980).

On remand, Ala.Cr.App., 405 So.2d 392.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Daniels v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 26, 1985
    ...motion for mistrial was properly overruled. Cf. Colley v. State, 405 So.2d 374, 381-82 (Ala.Cr.App.1979), rev'd on other grounds, 405 So.2d 391 (Ala.1981) (holding that the trial judge did not err in excusing prospective jurors outside the defendant's presence, for a local act applicable to......
  • Jackson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 9, 1985
    ...470 U.S. 1023, 105 S.Ct. 1384, 84 L.Ed.2d 403 (1985); Colley v. State, 405 So.2d 374 (Ala.Crim.App.1979), rev'd on other grounds, 405 So.2d 391 (Ala.1981). After examining the evidence and applying the proper standards of review, we find that there was sufficient evidence presented by the S......
  • Norris v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 26, 1999
    ...as it is not listed as such in § 13-11-6.' Colley v. State, 405 So.2d 374, 389 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979), reversed on other grounds, 405 So.2d 391 (Ala.1981)." 6. See Hargrave v. Wainwright, 804 F.2d 1182, 1195 (11th Cir.1986) (noting that "[a]n execution-style murder, as defined by the Florida co......
  • Berard v. State, 3 Div. 585
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • July 31, 1984
    ...as it is not listed as such in § 13-11-6." Colley v. State, 405 So.2d 374, 389 (Ala.Cr.App.1979), reversed on other grounds, 405 So.2d 391 (Ala.1981). In Ex parte Kyzer, 399 So.2d 330, 334 (Ala.1981), our Supreme Court held that in order to apply the aggravating circumstance that the crime ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT