Colli v. Kamins
| Citation | 39 Conn.Supp. 75,468 A.2d 295 |
| Decision Date | 08 November 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 277215,277215 |
| Court | Superior Court of Connecticut |
| Parties | George A. COLLI, Jr., et al. v. David E. KAMINS et al. -New Britain at Hartford |
Bromberg & Appleton, Hartford, for named plaintiff and Lester katz.
Shipman & Goodwin, Hartford, for named defendant.
Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, for defendant Albert D. Lizzi.
The plaintiff has brought this action in two counts, the first of which is based on a claim of vexatious litigation in connection with a lawsuit commenced by the defendants against the plaintiffs in the present action in September of 1979. Paragraph 5 of the amended complaint alleges that the suit was withdrawn on October 5, 1982, after it had been pending for more than three years, as a result of which the plaintiffs "incurred substantial legal expenses and losses of time." The defendant Albert D. Lizzi has moved to strike the first count of the complaint because it fails to allege that the prior action commenced by the present defendants has been reduced to judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.
"In actions for malicious prosecution, and in actions under our statute for vexatious suit, two of the essential allegations are (1) that no probable cause existed for instituting the prosecution or suit complained of, and (2) that such prosecution or suit terminated in some way favorably to the defendant therein." (Emphasis added.) Frisbie v. Morris, 75 Conn. 637, 639, 55 A. 9 (1903). When a lawsuit ends in a negotiated settlement or compromise, it does not terminate in the plaintiff's favor and therefore will not support a subsequent suit for vexatious litigation. Blake v. Levy, 191 Conn. 257, 264, 464 A.2d 52 (1983). "This conclusion recognizes that the law favors settlements, which conserve scarce judicial resources and minimize the parties' transaction costs, and avoids burdening such settlements with the threat of future litigation." Blake v. Levy, supra.
Lizzi claims that a complaint alleging vexatious litigation is fatally defective where it does not appear that the action alleged to have been commenced by the present defendants has been reduced to judgment in favor of the present plaintiffs. See Shurman v. Duncan, 14 Conn.Sup. 293 (1946). He claims that the withdrawal of the suit by the defendants in the underlying action is not sufficient to support a cause of action for vexatious litigation.
The torts of malicious prosecution and vexatious litigation are similar because in both types of action "the claimed impropriety arises out of previous litigation." Blake v. Levy, supra, 191 Conn. 262, 464 A.2d 52. The principles governing both torts are based on the "competing policies of deterrence of groundless litigation and protection of good faith access to the courts." Blake v. Levy, supra, 263, 464 A.2d 52. The requirement of termination may be satisfied by showing that the suit in question was abandoned or dismissed. 52 Am.Jur.2d, Malicious Prosecution, § 42. A final determination on the merits is unnecessary and the mere discontinuance of a civil suit in any...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
DeLaurentis v. City of New Haven
......493, 499, 16 A. 554 (1888); Wall v. Toomey, 52 Conn. 35, 39 (1884); Brown v. Randall, 36 Conn. 56 (1869); Colli v. Kamins, 39 Conn.Sup. 75, 77, 468 A.2d 295 (1983); 1 Z. Swift, Digest of the Laws of the State of Connecticut p. 497. Instead, we have always ......
-
Abbott v. United Venture Capital, Inc.
...Restatement. See, e.g., Weaver v. Superior Court, 95 Cal.App.3d 166, 184-85, 156 Cal.Rptr. 745, 755-56 (1979); Colli v. Kamins, 39 Conn.Supp. 75, 468 A.2d 295, 296-97 (1983); Wong v. Tabor, 422 N.E.2d 1279, 1284-85 (Ind.Ct.App.1981). But see C.N.C. Chemical Corp. v. Pennwalt Corp., 690 F.Su......
-
Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. McGugin
...and that a voluntary dismissal "without prejudice" will suffice. Wong v. Tabor, 422 N.E.2d 1279 (Ind.Ct.App.1981); Colli v. Kamins, 39 Conn.Supp. 75, 468 A.2d 295 (1983); Annot. 30 A.L.R. 4th 572 In its commentary on the requirement of a favorable termination, the Restatement (Second) of To......
-
Roberts v. Babkiewicz
...if he was discharged without a trial under circumstances amounting to an abandonment of the prosecution. . . ."); Colli v. Kamins, 39 Conn.Supp. 75, 468 A.2d 295, 297 (1983) ("An abandonment of a criminal proceeding, so far as the plaintiff's right to prevail is concerned, is the equivalent......
-
TABLE OF CASES
...v. Statewide Grievance Comm., 339 Conn. 503 (2021) 2-3:1, 4-3:6, 6-3 Cole v. Myers, 128 Conn. 223 (1941) 2-1, 11-2:1 Colli v. Kamins, 39 Conn. Supp. 75 (1983) 10-2:2 Collum v. Chapin, 40 Conn. App. 449 (1996) 9-4:1 Colon-Collazo v. Cox, No. CV12-60237015, 2015 WL 4880045 (Conn. Super. Ct. J......
-
CHAPTER 10 - 10-2 VEXATIOUS LITIGATION
...a severed equitable count, a second count alleging breach of contract remained pending on the jury trial list). [19] Colli v. Kamins, 39 Conn. Supp. 75 (1983).[20] DeLaurentis v. New Haven, 220 Conn. 225 (1991).[21] Frisbie v. Morris, 75 Conn. 637, 639 (1903) (emphasis added).[22] Hebrew Ho......