Collier v. City of Dallas
Decision Date | 19 August 1986 |
Citation | 798 F.2d 1410 |
Parties | Collier v. City of Dallas 86-1010 |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
N.D.Tex.
AFFIRMED
To continue reading
Request your trial6 cases
-
Schwarz v. Northwest Iowa Community College
...of rule in the circuit that vision that can be corrected to 20/200 does not constitute a handicap, citing Collier v. City of Dallas, 798 F.2d 1410 (5th Cir.1986) (unpublished), and further finding that plaintiff had testified that his vision did not substantially limit any major life activi......
-
Venclauskas v. Conn. Dept. of Public Safety, Civil No. 3:95CV00373 (AVC).
...Dallas, 2 F.3d 1385 (5th Cir.1993) ("a person is not handicapped if his vision can be corrected to 20/200"); Collier v. City of Dallas, 798 F.2d 1410 (5th Cir.1986) (unpublished). Second, the complaint alleges that the plaintiff falls within the EEOC definition of an "individual with a disa......
-
Stone v. La Quinta Inns, Inc.
..."is approximately 20/200." See Defendant's Exhibit B at p. 14. La Quinta bases this argument on Collier v. City of Dallas, No. 86-1010, 798 F.2d 1410 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 1986) (unpublished). Because La Quinta failed to attach a copy of this unpublished opinion to its memorandum, all that thi......
-
Rizzo v. Children's World Learning Centers, Inc., 97-50367
...of a vehicle owned by the employer which was involved in a vehicular accident." Chandler, 2 F.3d at 1395 (quoting Collier v. City of Dallas, 798 F.2d 1410 (1986) (unpublished)). In this case, of course, the danger was not so much to other drivers as to the children entrusted to Rizzo's care......
Request a trial to view additional results