Collins v. Jamaica Hosp.

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationCollins v. Jamaica Hosp., 551 N.Y.S.2d 950, 158 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Decision Date26 February 1990
PartiesJames J. COLLINS, etc., Respondent, v. JAMAICA HOSPITAL, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Jones Hirsch Connors & Bull, New York City (Michael Piziall and Louise H. Hayes, of counsel), for appellant Garcia A. Jean.

Bower & Gardner, New York City (Ethan B. Gerber, of counsel), for appellant Jamaica Hosp.

Henry Conan Caron, New York City, for respondent.

Before MOLLEN, P.J., and MANGANO, THOMPSON and BROWN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, (1) the defendant Garcia A. Jean appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (DiTucci, J.), dated February 17, 1989, as, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to so much of its prior determination in an order dated May 5, 1988, as denied that branch of his motion which was to dismiss the plaintiff's causes of action sounding in medical malpractice and wrongful death as time barred, and granted that branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was to dismiss the second, third and fourth affirmative defenses in his answer, and (2) the defendant Jamaica Hospital appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its cross motion to dismiss the cause of action sounding in wrongful death insofar as it is asserted against it as time barred.

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting from the second decretal paragraph thereof the word "only"; (2) deleting the fourth decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor provisions (a) vacating the provisions of the order of May 5, 1988, which denied that branch of the defendant Jean's motion which was to dismiss the plaintiff's cause of action sounding in wrongful death as time barred by the two-year Statute of Limitations and granted that branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was to dismiss the defendant Jean's fourth affirmative defense (b) granting that branch of the defendant Jean's motion which was to dismiss the plaintiff's cause of action sounding in wrongful death insofar as it is asserted against him and (c) denying that branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was to dismiss the defendant Jean's fourth affirmative defense, and (3) by adding, in the fifth decretal paragraph thereof, after the word "timely", the words "is granted"; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the appellants.

On December 7, 1984, Muriel James died during the course of a Ceasarean section operation performed by the defendant Jean in the operating room of the defendant Jamaica Hospital. Muriel James died intestate and was survived by her husband, mother, and two minor infants. Her husband, mother, and older infant were nondomiciliary aliens. Accordingly, under the applicable statute at the time of her death, all of these persons were unable to receive letters of administration (see, SCPA former 707(1)(a), (c); cf., SCPA 707(1)(c), as amended L.1986, ch. 780, § 1; Matter of Cowen, 134 Misc.2d 972, 513 N.Y.S.2d 610; Matter of Al-Ahmad, 133 Misc.2d 338, 507 N.Y.S.2d 378).

It was not until May 1987 that the decedent's husband initiated a proceeding in the Surrogate's Court, Queens County, to have an administrator appointed for the limited purpose of commencing an action against the defendants Jean and Jamaica Hospital. On June 5, 1987, letters of administration were issued to James Collins, the Public Administrator of Queens County. On that same day, a summons with notice, seeking damages for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death and naming Collins as the plaintiff and Jean and Jamaica Hospital as defendants, was filed with the Queens County Clerk pursuant to CPLR 203(b)(5). On August 4, 1987,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Ruiz v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 7, 1991
    ...Housing Authority, 161 A.D.2d 141, 554 N.Y.S.2d 859, app. dismd. 76 N.Y.2d 875, 560 N.Y.S.2d 986, 561 N.E.2d 886; Collins v. Jamaica Hospital, 158 A.D.2d 649, 551 N.Y.S.2d 950; DeFilippis v. State of New York, 157 A.D.2d 826, 550 N.Y.S.2d 728). Similarly, a claim for loss of consortium is n......
  • Spatafora v. St. John's Episcopal Hosp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 21, 1994
    ...action to recover damages for wrongful death was therefore properly dismissed as to all defendants (see, e.g., Collins v. Jamaica Hosp., 158 A.D.2d 649, 650, 551 N.Y.S.2d 950; Maldonado v. Long Is. Jewish Med. Center, 156 A.D.2d 431, 548 N.Y.S.2d All of the defendants were sued in their cap......
  • Collins v. Jamaica Hosp.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 28, 1990
    ...982 76 N.Y.2d 703, 559 N.E.2d 676 Collins (James J.) v. Jamaica Hospital NO. 517 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK JUN 28, 1990 --- A.D.2d ----, 551 N.Y.S.2d 950 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO Denied. ...