Columbia Bldg. & Loan Ass'n. v. Junquist

Decision Date24 May 1899
Citation111 F. 645
PartiesCOLUMBIA BUILDING & LOAN ASS'N. v. JUNQUIST et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Wyoming

Gibson Clark and J. Norman, for complainant.

McMicken & Blydenburg, for defendant.

RINER District Judge.

This is a suit in equity, brought to foreclose a trust deed given by the defendants to the plaintiff to secure the payment of the sum of $3,000. The plaintiff is a building and loan association. On the 4th of June, 1890, the defendant, William Junquist, became a member of the association by subscribing for 30 shares of its stock designated as 'Stock A,' and on that day a certificate for the stock was issued to him. On the 11th of December of the same year he borrowed the sum of $3,000, due six years after date, with interest and installments thereon, according to the by-laws and rules of the association; these amounts to be paid on or before the 5th day of each and every month, or to be counted as principal. While I have examined the evidence and briefs of counsel with great care, I have not had the time to prepare an opinion in writing, and shall only briefly state the grounds upon which my conclusions in this case are based. The plaintiff is a building and loan association organized under the laws of Colorado with the powers usually conferred upon associations of this character. While the statute may differ in some respects from the statutes of other states upon this subject, yet I think the powers conferred upon the corporation in this cause are substantially the same as those conferred upon and exercised by like corporations in other jurisdictions. The principle underlying its method of transacting business is mutuality, its object being to raise funds from its members to be loaned among themselves, or to such as may desire to avail themselves of the privilege. This is done by the payment, monthly, of certain amounts of interest and installments; and the stockholders, whether borrowers or nonborrowers participate alike in the earnings of the association, and alike must assist in bearing the burden of any loss which it may sustain. All of the stock is matured and all of the loans are made from what is called the loan fund; indeed, this necessarily follows from the fact that there is no other fund from which the stock can be matured. All members receive the same per cent. of profit for the reason that the dividends are declared on the entire business; and all payments made by...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Fidelity Savings Association v. Bank of Commerce
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • February 18, 1904
    ... ... and loan association, in which the defendant filed a ... ( Bennett v. Eastern B. & L ... Assn., 177 Pa. St., 233; Pioneer Sav. & Loan Assn ... v ... D., 138; Freie v. Assn., ... 166 Ill. 128; Columbia B. & L. Assn. v. Junquist, 111 Fed ... R., 645.) ... 220; ... Ewing v. Savings Assn., 43 O. St., 31; Bldg ... Assn. v. Mayers, 25 S. W., 1132; Stevens v ... ...
  • Clause v. Columbia Savings and Loan Association
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • April 21, 1908
    ...64 O. St. 26.) The contract of the shareholder was not limited to 72 monthly payments. (Asso'n. v. Lyttle, 16 Colo.App. 423; Asso'n. v. Jungquist, 111 F. 645; Kinney v. Asso'n., 113 F. POTTER, CHIEF JUSTICE. BEARD, J., and SCOTT, J., concur. OPINION POTTER, CHIEF JUSTICE. The defendant in e......
  • Pacific States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Green
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • May 25, 1903
    ...123 F. 43 PACIFIC STATES SAVINGS, LOAN & BLDG. CO. v. GREEN et al. No. 928.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth ... 11; Manship v. New South B. & L.A. (C.C.) 110 F ... 845, 855; Columbia B. & L.A. v. Junquist (C.C.) 111 ... F. 645; Kinney v. Columbia Savings & ... ...
  • Holmes v. Royal Loan Association
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • January 27, 1908
    ...v. Dorsey, 48 Md. 461; Bertche v. Equitable Loan, etc., Assn., 147 Mo. 360; Bldg. & L. Assn. v. Lyttle (Colo.), 66 P. 247; B. & L. Assn., v. Junquest, 111 F. 645; v. B. & L. Assn. 57 P. 14; 1 Thompson on Corporations, sec. 218, 495, 7 Id., sec. 8213. (4) Defendant's cross-bill should have b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT