Com. Dept. of Transp. Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Clawson
| Court | Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania |
| Citation | 305 A.2d 732,9 Pa.Cmwlth. 87 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF TRAFFIC SAFETY, Appellant, v. Thomas Jeffrey CLAWSON, Appellee. |
| Decision Date | 25 May 1973 |
Charles E. Marker, Marker & McBride, Greensburg, for appellee.
Before CRUMLISH, Jr., WILKINSON and ROGERS, JJ.
Thomas Jeffrey Clawson was placed under arrest and charged with the operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He refused the arresting officer's request that he submit to a chemical[9 Pa.Cmwlth. 89] test and his license was suspended by the Secretary of the Department of Transportation by authority of Section 624.1(a) of The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, 75 P.S. § 624.1(a). Mr. Clawson was acquitted of the criminal charge of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The court below, without the benefit of our holding to the contrary in Commonwealth v. Abraham, 7 Pa.Cmwlth. 535, 300 A.2d 831 (1973), sustained the appeal based upon the acquittal. We must, therefore, reverse.
Counsel for Mr. Clawson makes the further argument that his client's appeal was properly sustained below because the Commonwealth produced no evidence concerning his client's condition of intoxication at the time of the incident which led to the request that he submit to the breathalyzer test. There is no such duty upon the Commonwealth. It need only show the arrest upon the charge of driving while intoxicated, the request to take the test and the refusal.
And now, to wit, this 25th day of May, 1973, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County is reversed, and the order of the Secretary of Transportation is reinstated. The reinstated suspension shall issue within thirty (30) days.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Wolfe
...(1984); Wisniewski v. Commonwealth, 73 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 318, 457 A.2d 1334 (1983); Commonwealth v. Clawson, 9 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 87, 305 A.2d 732 (1973); Commonwealth v. Abraham, 7 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 535, 300 A.2d 831 (1973). The civil proceeding to revoke or suspend a license is not i......
-
Sheakley v. Com., Dept. of Transp.
...with any criminal charges which may be brought against [99 Pa.Cmwlth. 333] a motorist. Commonwealth v. Clawson, 9 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 87, 305 A.2d 732 In order to sustain a suspension of a motorist's driver's license for failing to submit to a breathalyzer, PennDOT is required to show, amon......
-
Com., Dept. of Transp., Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Kelly
......1) placed under arrest upon the charge of driving while intoxicated;. 2) was requested to submit to a breathalyzer test; and. 3) refused to do so. Commonwealth v. Clawson, 9 Pa.Cmwlth. 87, 305 A.2d 732 (1973); Commonwealth v. Miles, 8 Pa.Cmwlth. 544, 304 A.2d 704 (1973). In the instant case, the record clearly establishes each of these elements. A question to which we have not previously addressed ourselves, however, is whether the Commonwealth, after proving an ......
-
Croissant v. Com.
...have no bearing on the civil suspension proceedings under Section 1547. Sheakley; Commonwealth v. Clawson, 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 87, 305 A.2d 732 (1973). Appellant cannot rely upon the use of the test results in a criminal context to prove a violation of equal protection under a statute th......