Com. ex rel. Holcombe v. Strode
Citation | 402 A.2d 1067,266 Pa.Super. 39 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania ex rel. Alfred D. HOLCOMBE v. R. Brinton STRODE. Appeal of Alfred D. HOLCOMBE. |
Decision Date | 11 May 1979 |
Court | Superior Court of Pennsylvania |
Page 1067
v.
R. Brinton STRODE.
Appeal of Alfred D. HOLCOMBE.
Decided May 11, 1979.
[266 Pa.Super. 41] Waring R. Fincke, State College, and with him Alan Ellis, State College, for appellant.
Robert F. Banks, First Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee Strode.
Before JACOBS, President Judge, and HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT, SPAETH and HESTER, JJ.
CERCONE, President Judge:
This is an appeal from the order of the court below denying appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and ordering his
Page 1068
extradition to New York. Appellant's sole contention is that his confinement was not in accordance with the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act. 1 We disagree and affirm.The pertinent facts are as follows. Late in the evening of April 8, 1977, appellant was arrested at a motel in Lycoming County by a representative of the New York State Police acting in conjunction with a Pennsylvania State trooper. [266 Pa.Super. 42] The arrest was based on the fact that fugitive warrants had previously been issued by a New York state judge charging appellant with being under indictment for criminal possession of a controlled substance and bail jumping. Early the following morning, April 9, 1977, appellant was taken before a local magistrate where a complaint was filed charging him with being a fugitive from justice from the State of New York. Bail was set at $75,000 and in default in posting it appellant was committed to the Lycoming County jail. Counsel was appointed to represent appellant on April 14, 1977.
On May 23, 1977, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania withdrew the fugitive complaint that had been filed against appellant on April 9, 1977. That same day, however, the Commonwealth lodged a new fugitive from justice complaint against appellant. 2 A preliminary hearing was held on this new complaint on June 1, 1977, and appellant was committed to the county prison for a period of thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 15 of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, supra. 19 P.S. § 191.15.
On June 23, 1977, appellant, pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, supra, was formally arrested on a warrant issued by the Governor of Pennsylvania. 19 P.S. § 191.7. Subsequently, on July 7, 1977, appellant filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and a hearing was held on July 15, 1977. On July 19, 1977, the petition was denied and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Phillips
...... than 30 days without a formal request from the county attorney); Holcombe v. Strode, 266 Pa.Super. 39, 402 A.2d 1067 (Pa.Super.Ct.1979) (holding ......
-
Com. v. Brown
...9138), ninety days) and before a governor's warrant is executed." Commonwealth ex rel. Holcombe v. Strode, --- Pa.Super. ---, ---, 402 A.2d 1067, 1969 (1979) (emphasis in original). See also Commonwealth v. Rowe, supra. "In short, once the relator has been arrested under the authority of a ......
-
State ex rel. Eggleston v. Hatrak
...... In Com. ex rel. Holcombe v. Stroda, 266 Pa.Super. 39, 43-44, 402 A.2d 1067, 1069 (1979), the Pennsylvania ......
-
Commonwealth v. Brown
......288, 19 P.S. § 191.15) and. Commonwealth ex rel. Knowles v. Lester, 456 Pa. 423,. 321 A.2d 637 (1974). Section 9136 ... warrant is executed.". . . Commonwealth. ex rel. Holcombe v. Strode, 266 Pa.Super. 39, ---, 402. A.2d 1067, 1969 (1979) (emphasis ......