Com. v. Albert

Decision Date01 November 1978
Citation260 Pa.Super. 20,393 A.2d 991
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. James ALBERT, a/k/a James Holland, Appellant.
CourtPennsylvania Superior Court

Paulette J. Balogh and Lester G. Nauhaus, Asst. Public Defenders, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

Robert L. Eberhardt, Asst. Dist. Atty., and Robert E. Colville, Dist. Atty., Pittsburgh, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before JACOBS, President Judge, and HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT, SPAETH and HESTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of robbery, theft of movable property, and recklessly endangering another person. He urges upon us several grounds for reversal, but we do not reach those issues. Because appellant escaped from justice while this appeal was pending, and to this day remains a fugitive from justice, 1 we quash the appeal.

A defendant who is convicted at trial and absconds from justice may not, as a fugitive, pursue his appeal rights. Commonwealth v. Tomlinson, 467 Pa. 22, 354 A.2d 254 (1976). The trial court must dismiss any post-verdict motions filed on behalf of a fugitive, and in its discretion may refuse to grant leave to re-file the motions, even upon the return of the defendant to the control of the Commonwealth. Commonwealth v. Boyd, 244 Pa.Super. 98, 366 A.2d 934 (1976). When the trial court dismisses post-verdict motions on the grounds of fugitivity, and that dismissal is appealed to us, we may, in our discretion, grant leave to re-file nunc pro tunc if at the time we enter our order the defendant has returned. Commonwealth v. Borden,--- Pa.Super. ---, 389 A.2d 633 (filed July 12, 1978). If a defendant becomes a fugitive after appellate jurisdiction has already attached, we may decide the merits of his appeal if he returns prior to the time of this Court's disposition, Commonwealth v. Galloway, 460 Pa. 309, 333 A.2d 741 (1975), but if the appellant remains a fugitive at the time of our decision, then we must quash his appeal. Commonwealth v. Barron, 237 Pa.Super. 369, 352 A.2d 84 (1975).

The Notice of Appeal in this case was filed January 20, 1977. Appellant became a fugitive from justice on August 6, 1977, by escaping from the Allegheny County jail. Because he remains a fugitive from justice, this Court must quash his appeal.

Appeal quashed.

HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

1 Counsel of record have filed a stipulation setting forth the facts of appellan...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Doctor v. Walters
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 4 Noviembre 1996
    ...307 Pa.Super. 129, 452 A.2d 1072 (1982); Commonwealth v. Harrison, 289 Pa.Super. 126, 432 A.2d 1083 (1981); Commonwealth v. Albert, 260 Pa.Super. 20, 393 A.2d 991 (1978); Commonwealth v. Borden, 256 Pa.Super. 125, 389 A.2d 633 (1978); Commonwealth v. Boyd, 244 Pa.Super. 98, 366 A.2d 934 (19......
  • J.J., In Interest of
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 18 Abril 1995
    ...307 Pa.Super. 129, 452 A.2d 1072 (1982); Commonwealth v. Harrison, 289 Pa.Super. 126, 432 A.2d 1083 (1981); Commonwealth v. Albert, 260 Pa.Super. 20, 393 A.2d 991 (1978); Commonwealth v. Borden, 256 Pa.Super. 125, 389 A.2d 633 (1978); Commonwealth v. Boyd, 244 Pa.Super. 98, 366 A.2d 934 (19......
  • Commonwealth v. Cotton
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 12 Octubre 1999
    ...when court learned from the district attorney's office and public defender that appellant was a fugitive); Commonwealth v. Albert, 260 Pa.Super. 20, 393 A.2d 991 (1978) (per curiam) (appeal quashed due to fugitive status of appellant during pendency of the appeal); Commonwealth v. Barron, 2......
  • Com. v. Passaro
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 25 Mayo 1984
    ...v. Lewis, 300 Pa.Super. 191, 446 A.2d 295 (1982); In Interest of Dixon, 282 Pa.Super. 189, 422 A.2d 892 (1980); Commonwealth v. Albert, 260 Pa.Super. 20, 393 A.2d 991 (1978); Commonwealth v. Barron, 237 Pa.Super. 369, 352 A.2d 84 (1975); and is expressly provided for in our Rules of Appella......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT