Com. v. Baughman

Decision Date09 October 1986
Citation357 Pa.Super. 535,516 A.2d 390
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Richard Allen BAUGHMAN, Appellant.
CourtPennsylvania Superior Court

Anthony S. Guido, DuBois, for appellant.

Joseph A. Curcillo, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., Clearfield, for Com., appellee.

Before ROWLEY, McEWEN and TAMILIA, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Clearfield County. Following a bench trial, appellant Richard Allen Baughman was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731. Post-trial motions were denied, and appellant was sentenced to thirty days to one year imprisonment, a fine of $500.00, and directed to attend a driving course. We affirm.

Appellant does not deny that he was under the influence of alcohol or that he was operating a motor vehicle. The sole question presented for our review, an issue of first impression, is whether the dirt track, through a field which was open to the public and occasionally used for vehicular traffic, on which appellant was operating the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, was "a trafficway" as defined by 75 Pa.C.S. § 102.

Appellant was discovered in his vehicle, by a deputy sheriff, attempting to move his car. The car was straddling a railroad track which ran parallel to the "trafficway" in question. At trial, the trafficway was described as a one-lane, dirt road which was on private property and dead-ended. Tire tracks appeared on the dirt from cars occasionally travelling on the surfaceway.

Section 102 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 102, defines trafficway as follows:

"Trafficway." The entire width between property lines or other boundary lines of every way or place of which any part is open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel as a matter of right or custom.

Appellant contends that the phrase "between property lines or other boundary lines" defines "trafficway" so that the term "clearly contemplates a private roadway used by several different residences to gain access. In other words, a private roadway located between the boundary lines of several properties which are used in common by the various properties for access."

The restrictive definition appellant urges upon us is inconsistent with the Statutory Construction Act of 1972. Our Court "must construe the words of a statute according to their plain meaning." Commonwealth v. Stanley, 498 Pa. 326, 335, 446 A.2d 583, 587 (1982); see also 1 Pa.C.S. § 1903. Webster's Third New International Dictionary (1981) at 260 defines "boundary" as "something...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Scrapchansky v. Town of Plainfield
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • July 13, 1993
    ...99 (1937); see also Peachtree on Peachtree Inn, Inc. v. Camp, 120 Ga.App. 403, 410, 170 S.E.2d 709 (1969); Commissioner v. Baughman, 357 Pa.Super. 535, 538, 516 A.2d 390 (1986), appeal denied, 515 Pa. 572, 527 A.2d 534 (1987)." State v. Boucher, 207 Conn. 612, 615, 541 A.2d 865 (1988). The ......
  • State v. Boucher
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • May 31, 1988
    ...99 (1937); see also Peachtree on Peachtree Inn, Inc. v. Camp, 120 Ga.App. 403, 410, 170 S.E.2d 709 (1969); Commonwealth v. Baughman, 357 Pa.Super. 535, 538, 516 A.2d 390 (1986), appeal denied, 515 Pa. 572, 527 A.2d 534 (1987). The essential feature of a public use is that it is not confined......
  • Com. v. Cozzone
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • July 30, 1991
    ...in concluding that the motel parking lot was not a trafficway. Id. at 595, 535 A.2d at 1250-1251. See also: Commonwealth v. Baughman, 357 Pa.Super. 535, 516 A.2d 390 (1986) (one lane, dead end, dirt road located on private property was trafficway where evidence showed it had been used by oc......
  • Com. v. Owen
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • September 24, 1990
    ...See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Wilson, 381 Pa.Super. 253, 553 A.2d 452 (1989), allocatur denied (June 30, 1989); Commonwealth v. Baughman, 357 Pa.Super. 535, 516 A.2d 390 (1986); see also Commonwealth, Dept. of Transp. v. Bendik, 112 Pa.Commw. 591, 535 A.2d 1249 (1988). In the case at bar, by c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT