Com. v. Bomar

• Decision Date: 30 May 2003
• Citation: 573 Pa. 426,826 A.2d 831
• Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Arthur BOMAR, Appellant.
• Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

826 A.2d 831

573 Pa. 426

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v.Arthur BOMAR, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 16, 2001.

Decided May 30, 2003.

Reargument Denied July 17, 2003.

Steven C. Leach, Drexel Hill, for Appellant, Arthur Bomar.

William R. Toal, Media, Amy Zapp, Harrisburg, for Appellee, Com. of PA.

Before: FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

OPINION

JUSTICE CASTILLE.

On October 1, 1998, a jury sitting in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County convicted appellant of first-degree murder,¹ rape,² aggravated assault,³ kidnapping,⁴ and abuse of corpse⁵ in connection with the killing of Aimee Willard.At the penalty hearing, the jury found three aggravating circumstances: the killing was committed during the perpetration of a felony,⁶the defendant has a significant history of felony convictions involving the use or threat of violence to the person,⁷ and the defendant has been convicted of another murder committed in any jurisdiction and committed either before or at the time of the offense at issue.⁸The jury found one mitigating circumstance: any other evidence of mitigation concerning the character and record of the defendant and the circumstances of his offense.⁹The jury determined that the aggravating circumstances outweighed the mitigating circumstance and accordingly returned a sentence of death.¹⁰On December 4, 1998, the trial court formally imposed the death sentence.In addition, the trial court ruled that appellant was a high-risk, dangerous offender pursuant to the then-governing provisions of 42 Pa.C.S. § 9714.Accordingly, the trial court sentenced appellant to consecutive terms of 10 to 20 years' imprisonment on the rape conviction and 10 to 20 years' imprisonment on the kidnapping conviction.The trial court also sentenced appellant to 1 to 2 years' consecutive imprisonment on the abuse of corpse conviction.¹¹

Trial counsel subsequently withdrew from the case and present counsel entered the matter and filed post-sentence motions on appellant's behalf, including claims that trial counsel was ineffective.Following hearings on these motions on March 4, 1999, and April 20, 1999, the trial court denied post-sentence relief.This direct appeal followed.For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of sentence of death.However, we vacate the judgments of sentence for rape, kidnapping and abuse of corpse and remand for resentencing as to these convictions.

I.Sufficiency of the Evidence

Although appellant has not challenged the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his first-degree murder conviction, this Court performs a self-imposed duty to review the sufficiency of that evidence in capital cases.SeeCommonwealth v. Zettlemoyer,500 Pa. 16, 454 A.2d 937, 942 n. 3(1982),cert. denied,461 U.S. 970, 103 S.Ct. 2444, 77 L.Ed.2d 1327(1983).In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, the Court must determine whether the evidence admitted at trial, and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom, when viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, supports the jury's finding of all of the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.Commonwealth v. Spotz,563 Pa. 269, 759 A.2d 1280, 1283(2000)(citingCommonwealth v. Rhodes,510 Pa. 537, 510 A.2d 1217, 1218(1986))."Evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction of first-degree murder where the Commonwealth establishes that the defendant acted with the specific intent to kill, that a human being was unlawfully killed, that the person accused did the killing, and that the killing was done with premeditation or deliberation."Spotz,759 A.2d at 1283(citing18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(d)andCommonwealth v. Mitchell,528 Pa. 546, 599 A.2d 624, 626(1991)).Specific intent to kill can be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon upon a vital part of the body.Commonwealth v. Fletcher,561 Pa. 266, 750 A.2d 261, 267(2000).

The evidence presented at trial established the following: At approximately 10:30 p.m. on the evening of June 19, 1996, the victim, 22-year-old Aimee Willard, met several of her high school friends at a bar located on Lancaster Avenue in Wayne, Pennsylvania.Later that night, at approximately 1:25 a.m., Ms. Willard left the bar alone.She would not make it home.

At approximately 2:00 a.m., on June 20, 1996, the victim's car, a blue Honda Civic, was discovered on the southbound off-ramp of the Springfield-Lima Exit of Interstate 476 in Delaware County.The car's engine was still running, the driver's side door was open, the radio was playing and the interior lights and headlights were on.There was a rough abrasion on the back bumper of the victim's car.There was a pool of blood on the ground in front of the vehicle with drops of blood leading away from it.A tire iron was located near the pool of blood.Later that morning, police discovered a pair of sneakers and a pair of female underpants with a sanitary pad near the abandoned car.The sneakers were later identified as belonging to the victim and the underpants were later identified as the size worn by the victim.Hairs found on the sanitary pad were consistent with the pubic hairs of the victim.The police also obtained tire impressions from the scene.

At approximately 5:00 p.m., on June 20, 1996, Aimee Willard's body was found naked, positioned face down, with two plastic bags covering her head, in a vacant lot at 16th Street and Indiana Avenue in Philadelphia.The victim's injuries included multiple blunt force injuries to her head, brain and face; an abraded contusion on her left shoulder and upper chest; a rectangular shaped contusion beneath her left breast; a patterned, angular thermal injury resembling a flower petal on her right lower chest and upper abdomen; numerous fractures in her neck; bruises on her left and right thighs; and defensive wounds on her left and right forearms.There was intact degenerate sperm found in the victim's vaginal cavity.In addition, a tree branch had been forced into her vagina.There was no blood surrounding or beneath the body or leading up to or away from the body, indicating that the victim was not killed at the site but rather had been killed elsewhere and then moved to this location.Several hours after the discovery of Aimee Willard's body, at approximately 11:25 p.m., on June 20, 1996, appellant was coincidentally stopped by the police at the intersection of 20th Street and Erie Avenue in Philadelphia, eight blocks from where the victim's body had been found.Appellant was driving a green 1993Ford Escort.The police did not arrest appellant at that time.

Nearly a year later, on June 5, 1997, appellant was arrested in Ardmore, Pennsylvania, on an outstanding warrant for violating his parole from a conviction for second degree murder that occurred in Las Vegas, Nevada, and for an unrelated criminal trespass.That evening, investigators from the Delaware County Criminal Investigation Division(CID) questioned appellant concerning the Willard murder.Appellant told the investigators, among other things, that he drove a 1993Ford Escort until March of 1997, that he had been to the same bar that the victim had been to on the night of June 19, 1996, previously with a former girlfriend, and that he routinely traveled on Interstate 476.

On July 10, 1997, two Pennsylvania State Police troopers met with appellant's then-girlfriend, Mary Rumer.Rumer told the troopers that appellant had confessed to her that he murdered Aimee Willard.She told police that appellant related the following events to her: Appellant observed Aimee leave the bar, get into her car, and begin to drive away.He followed in his own car.Appellant stopped Aimee's car on Interstate 476 and flashed a fake police badge.When Aimee asked why she was being stopped, appellant told her that she was swerving on the road.Aimee then became angry, at which point appellant punched her, knocking her unconscious.After placing the victim in his car, appellant drove to an abandoned building.Appellant took the victim's clothes, placed them in a trash bag and threw them away.Appellant hit the victim's head with a hard object and killed her.He also admitted raping the victim to Rumer.

Rumer also told the troopers that appellant had shown her the location on Interstate 476 where Aimee Willard's car was abandoned as well as the vacant lot where her body was recovered.

On July 11, 1997, the police conducted a search of appellant's 1993Ford Escort pursuant to a search warrant.The police seized and removed the following articles: the left front tire of the vehicle, a Firestone FR440 P17570R13; the oil pan from the undercarriage of the vehicle; and the right front door panel, which contained several brownish spots that later tested positive for blood.The tire taken from appellant's car was consistent in tread design, size, and wear pattern with the tire impressions taken from the area where the victim's car was found abandoned.The repeating cross-rectangle shape features, the vertical lines, and the machined edge present on the oil pan taken from appellant's vehicle matched the pattern injury on the right side of the victim's body.Most significantly, deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") testing of the bloodstains on the door panel indicated that Aimee Willard was a contributor to the stains.

On July 13, 1997, the police executed a search warrant for samples of appellant's blood.DNA testing of the blood samples established that appellant's DNA profile matched the DNA profile of the male fraction developed from vaginal swabs taken from Aimee Willard.There was but a one in 500 million chance that someone other than appellant was the source of the genetic material taken from the victim.

Also in July of 1997, David O'Donald, appellant's ex-brother-in-law, who was incarcerated in a federal prison for unrelated offenses, met with law enforcement officials to...