Com. v. Bricker
| Decision Date | 12 October 1971 |
| Citation | 282 A.2d 31,444 Pa. 476 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Robert L. BRICKER, Appellant. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Robert W. Duggan, Dist. Atty., Carol Mary Los, Robert L. Campbell, Asst. Dist. Attys., Pittsburgh, for appellee.
Before BELL, C.J., and JONES, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY and BARBIERI, JJ.
After pleading guilty to murder generally, appellant was found guilty of first degree murder at a degree of guilt hearing held on July 22, 1964, and sentenced to life imprisonment in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. Appellant filed a Post Conviction Hearing Act * (PCHA) petition on April 3, 1969, alleging, inter alia, that he had not intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. The hearing court found that appellant had, in fact, been denied his right of appeal, and ordered that appellant be permitted to file an appeal as though timely filed. The hearing court, however, went on to discuss the remaining issues raised in the petition and denied relief as to them.
We have decided in Commonwealth v. Robinson, 442 Pa. 512 n. 2, 276 A.2d 537 (1971) and Commonwealth v. Harris, 443 Pa. 279, 278 A.2d 159 (1971) that when it is determined that a defendant has not been properly advised of his right of appeal from a judgment of first degree murder following a plea of guilty to murder generally, the proper practice is for the PCHA court to terminate the hearing and remand the case to the trial court to allow the petitioner to file post trial motions. See also, Commonwealth v. Lowery, 438 Pa. 89, 263 A.2d 332 (1970); Commonwealth v. Faison, 437 Pa. 432, 436 n. 4, 264 A.2d 394 (1970).
Accordingly, we remand this case to the court below so that appellant, with the assistance of counsel, may file post trial motions within 30 days from the date of the entry of this order. In the event that the court below dismisses such motions, appellant shall be permitted to file an appeal from the judgment of sentence as though timely filed.
* Act of January 25, 1966, P.L. 1580, § 1, (as amended), 19 P.S. § 1180--1 et seq.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Commonwealth v. Bricker
-
Com. v. Bailey
...post-trial motions before a Court en banc." The court made no disposition of the other post-conviction claims. See Commonwealth v. Bricker, 444 Pa. 476, 282 A.2d 31 (1971) and cases following it. When the post-trial motions were then briefed and argued to a court en banc, the claim that tri......
- Commonwealth v. Cooney
-
Commonwealth v. Bailey
... ... left, appellant was having difficulty standing up. This ... witness was never interviewed prior to trial ... In Com ... ex rel. Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599, 604, 235 ... A.2d 349, 352-53 (1967), we stated: ... " ... our inquiry ceases and counsel's ... banc." The court made no disposition of the other ... post-conviction claims. See Commonwealth v. Bricker, ... 444 Pa. 476, 282 A.2d 31 (1971) and cases following it. When ... the post-trial motions were then briefed and argued to a ... court en banc, ... ...