Com. v. Burton
Decision Date | 28 February 2001 |
Citation | 770 A.2d 771 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Frankie Gerald BURTON, Appellant. |
Court | Pennsylvania Superior Court |
William E. Moore, Lansdale, for appellant.
Michael Marino, Assistant District Attorney, Norristown, for Commonwealth, appellee.
Before JOHNSON, FORD ELLIOTT, and OLSZEWSKI, JJ.
¶ 1 Frankie Gerald Burton appeals his judgment of sentence. We affirm.
At approximately 8:20 p.m., in Hatboro, Morris Shatzkin, 76, was assaulted by a man he identified as [appellant], who attempted to steal his automobile in the parking lot of a fast-food restaurant. [Mr. Shatzkin testified] that [appellant] "reeked of alcohol," that [appellant] demanded his wallet, and that [appellant] told him he ([appellant]) was in trouble and wanted Shatzkin to "take him somewhere." The location of this attempted robbery was approximately one mile from the previous incident. Between 9:00 p.m. and 9:20 p.m., a man identified as [appellant], and riding a blue Huffy mountain bike, approached [R.E.] and [C.A.], aged 15 and 17, respectively, ... and attempted to rob them of money. This incident occurred less than one-quarter mile from the attempted carjacking.
Trial Court Opinion, 6/19/00, at 16-18 (citations omitted). Following a trial, a jury found appellant guilty of robbery as to C.A. and R.E., terroristic threats as to Mr. Shatzkin, C.A., R.E., and L.S., burglary and theft as to the Frieman and Staples residences, indecent assault as to K.V. and Ms. Foreman, attempted burglary of the McPeak residence, attempted kidnapping of L.S., attempted robbery of Mr. Shatzkin's motor vehicle, solicitation and stalking as to K.V., and simple assault as to L.S.2See N.T. Verdict, 7/16/99, at 149-51. The trial court sentenced appellant to 42 to 118 years' imprisonment. See N.T. Sentencing, 9/7/99, at 90. This appeal followed.
¶ 2 Appellant raises nine issues on appeal:
I. Did the Trial Court err in granting [the] Commonwealth's [m]otion to consolidate?
¶ 3 Appellant first claims that the trial court erred in granting the Commonwealth's motion to consolidate all of the charges against him, as well as in denying his motion to sever the charges. See Brief for Appellant at 16. "The determination of whether separate indictments should be consolidated for trial is within the sole discretion of the trial court and such discretion will be reversed only for a manifest abuse of discretion or prejudice and clear injustice to the defendant." Commonwealth v. Boyle, 733 A.2d 633, 635 (Pa.Super.1999). Rules of Criminal Procedure 1127 and 1128 state the appropriate standards for consolidation and severance:
The court may order separate trials... if it appears that any party may be prejudiced by offenses ... being tried together.
Pa.R.Crim.P. 1127, 1128. Pursuant to these rules, we must determine:
Id. at 636 (citations omitted). Legitimate purposes include:
"(1) motive; (2) intent; (3) absence of mistake or accident; (4) a common scheme, plan or design embracing commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of one tends to prove the others; or (5) to establish the identity of the person charged with the commission of the crime on trial, in other words, where there is such a logical connection between the crimes that proof of one will naturally tend to show that the accused is the person who committed the other."
Id. (quoting Commonwealth v. Buchanan, 456 Pa.Super. 95, 689 A.2d 930, 932 (1997)). Further, evidence of other crimes is admissible in "`situations where the distinct crimes were part of a chain or sequence of events which formed the history of the case and were part of its natural development.' " Id. (quoting Commonwealth v. Billa, 521 Pa. 168, 555 A.2d 835, 840 (1989)). "This ... is also known as the `complete story' rationale, i.e., evidence of other criminal acts is admissible `to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.'" Commonwealth v. Lark, 518 Pa. 290, 543 A.2d 491, 497 (1988) (quoting McCormick, Evidence § 190 (1972 2d ed.)). Here, each separate offense related to the others to form a logical story. Appellant rode around searching for money or items to sell, as well as a young female with which to have sex. With the exception of Ms. Foreman, who looked like a teenager, all of appellant's victims were young girls. Once appellant realized he had to escape, he attempted to steal a getaway vehicle from Mr. Shatzkin, even confiding that he "was in trouble." Trial Court Opinion, 6/19/00, at 17. After Mr. Shatzkin rebuffed his attempt, he began his search for money in attempting to rob R.E. and C.A. He then began systematically invading nearby homes. Her...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Mouzon
...a sentence within the statutory limits fails to raise a substantial question as a matter of law. See id. (citing Commonwealth v. Burton, 770 A.2d 771 (Pa.Super.2001)) (citation omitted) ("a claim of excessiveness when the sentence is within the statutory limits is not a substantial question......
-
Commonwealth v. Johnson
...is also proper where the separate offenses form a pattern which explains defendant's course of conduct. Commonwealth v. Burton , 770 A.2d 771, 778 (Pa. Super. 2001).Here, the murder took place on a different date than the burglary, none of the eyewitnesses overlapped, and different officers......
-
Commonwealth of Pa. v. James Fulmore.Commonwealth of Pa.
...‘so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.’ ” Commonwealth v. Burton, 770 A.2d 771, 782 (Pa.Super.2001), appeal denied, 582 Pa. 669, 868 A.2d 1197 (2005), overruled on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Mouzon, 571 Pa. 419, ......
-
Cash v. Overmeyer, Civil Action No. 17-47
...so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable mis-identification." Commonwealth v. Burton, 770 A.2d 771,782 (Pa. Super. 2001), appeal denied, 868 A.2d 1197 (Pa. Super. 2005), overruled on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Mouzon, 812 A.2d 617,623......