Com. v. Cruz-Centeno
Decision Date | 13 May 1996 |
Citation | 676 A.2d 1195,544 Pa. 653 |
Parties | Commonwealth v. Efrain Cruz-Centeno NO. 1013 E.D.ALLOC. (1995) |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial20 cases
-
Commonwealth v. Radecki
...not adequately consider’ certain factors does not raise a substantial question that the sentence was inappropriate,"), appeal denied , 544 Pa. 653, 676 A.2d 1195 (1996) ; Commonwealth v. Bershad , 693 A.2d 1303, 1309 (Pa. Super. 1997) (finding absence of substantial question where appellant......
-
Commonwealth v. Watson
......Cruz-Centeno , 447 Pa.Super. 98, 668 A.2d 536 (1995), appeal denied , 544 Pa. 653, 676 A.2d 1195 (1996) (explaining claim that court did not properly consider ......
-
Commonwealth v. Thomas, J-S13029-21
...the sentence as appropriate under the Sentencing Code. See Commonwealth v. Cruz-Centeno, [668 A.2d 536 (Pa.Super. 1995)], appeal denied, 544 Pa. 653, 676 A.2d 1195 (1996) (stating combination of PSI and standard range sentence, absent more, cannot be considered excessive or unreasonable).Co......
-
Commonwealth v. Thomas
......See Commonwealth v. Cruz-Centeno , [668 A.2d 536 (Pa.Super. 1995) ], appeal denied , 544 Pa. 653, 676 A.2d 1195 (1996) (stating combination of PSI and standard range sentence, absent ......
Request a trial to view additional results