Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-800-335-6202

Com. v. GARRUS

Document Cited in 3 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Decision Date29 September 2003
Citation832 A.2d 1063
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Nakia GARRUS, Appellant.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

832 A.2d 1063

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Nakia GARRUS, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

September 29, 2003.

Daniel H. Greene, Philadelphia, for Nakia Garrus.

Hugh J. Burns, Philadelphia, for Com., appellee.

Before CAPPY, C.J. and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and LAMB, JJ.

Prior Report: Pa.Super., 815 A.2d 1125.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Garrus v. Secretary of the Pa. Dep't of Corr.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 21 d5 Setembro d5 2012
    ...438, 817 A.2d 455 (2003), but later dismissed the appeal in September 2003 as having been improvidently granted. Commonwealth v. Garrus, 574 Pa. 655, 832 A.2d 1063 (2003). In April 2004, Garrus filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Plea......
  • Com. v. Bavusa
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 29 d1 Setembro d1 2003

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT