Com. v. Graves
| Decision Date | 05 January 1891 |
| Citation | 29 N.E. 579,155 Mass. 163 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. GRAVES. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
A.E. Pillsbury, Atty. Gen., and C.N. Harris, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.
P.H. Hutchinson, for defendant.
Under St. 1887, c. 435, "whoever has been twice convicted of crime, sentenced, and committed to prison, in this or any other state, or once in this and once at least in any other state, for terms of not less than three years each, shall, upon conviction of a felony committed in this state after the passage of this act, be deemed to be an habitual criminal, and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state-prison for twenty-five years," etc. The defendant contends that this statute can only be applied to cases in which the former convictions on which sentences were imposed were subsequent to the passage of the act, and that, if it included cases in which the former convictions were before, it would be unconstitutional. The statute relates to the judgment to be rendered and the sentence to be imposed in cases arising after it goes into effect. It is prospective, and not retrospective. It deals with offenders for offenses committed after its passage, but it provides that, in considering the nature of an offense and the condition into which the offender is brought by it, his previous conduct may be regarded. The meaning of the statute in this particular seems clear, and we have no doubt that it is applicable to the case before us. With this construction it is not unconstitutional as an ex post facto law. In punishing offenses committed after its passage, it punishes the offenders for a criminal habit whose existence cannot be proved without showing their voluntary criminal act done after they are presumed to have had knowledge of the statute. Such an act is a manifestation of the habit, which tends to establish and confirm it, and for which the wrong doer may well be held responsible. That statutes of this kind are constitutional is settled by well-considered adjudications of this court. Ross' Case, 2 Pick. 165; Com. v. Phillips, 11 Pick. 28; Plumbly v. Com., 2 Metc. (Mass.) 413; Com. v. Hughes, 133 Mass. 496; Com. v. Marchand, (Bristol county, 1891,) 29 N.E. 578. Exceptions overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cross v. State
... ... insufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty under the first ... information. Bargesser v. State, supra; People v ... Graves, 331 Ill. 268, 162 N.E. 839. A verdict of guilty ... will not be set aside by an appellate court where there is ... sufficient evidence to sustain ... otherwise.' The point is ably summarized by the Supreme ... Court of Virginia in Rand v. Com., 9 Grat. (50 Va.) ... 738, wherein that court said: 'The constitution withholds ... from the legislature the power to convert, by statute, into a ... ...
-
State v. Rowe
...in question was enacted or became effective. The court in discussing the case further stated: "But the case of Commonwealth v. Graves, 155 Mass. 163, 29 N.E. 579, 16 L.R.A. 256, is in point. In that case the offense pleaded as a prior conviction was committed prior to the enactment of the s......
-
State v. King
...Id., 224 U.S. loc. cit. 630, 32 S.Ct. loc. cit. 588. Among other authorities to like effect are: Commonwealth v. Graves, 155 Mass. 163, 29 N.E. 579, 16 L.R.A. 256; In re Miller, 110 Mich. 676, 68 N.W. 990, 34 L.R.A. 398, 400, 64 Am.St.Rep. 376; Taylor v. State, 114 Neb. 257, 207 N.W. 207, 2......
-
Davis v. Berry
... ... Gregory v. Jones (D.C.) 128 F. 626; Kelly v ... People, 115 Ill. 583, 4 N.E. 644, 56 Am.Rep. 184; ... Commonwealth v. Graves, 155 ... [216 F. 415] ... Mass. 163, 29 N.E. 579, 16 L.R.A. 256; Sturtevant v ... Commonwealth, 158 Mass. 598, 33 N.E. 648; In re ... Miller, ... ...