Com. v. Harris

Decision Date21 June 2004
Citation578 Pa. 240,851 A.2d 856
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Samuel E. HARRIS, Appellee.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Donald R. Totaro, Esq., Kelly M. Sekula, Esq., for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Barry Gene Goldman, Esq., Lancaster, for Samuel E. Harris.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR and BAER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2004, the order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas is reversed insofar as it declared the Registration of Sexual Offenders Act unconstitutional, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. See Commonwealth v. Williams, 574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 (2003); Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 576 Pa. 101, 838 A.2d 710 (2003).

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Com. v. Harris
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • 22 Abril 2009
    ...order insofar as it found specified provisions of Megan's Law unconstitutional and remanded for further proceedings. Commonwealth v. Harris, 578 Pa. 240, 851 A.2d 856 (2004), citing Williams II, supra; Maldonado, supra. Ultimately, the SOAB determined that appellee did not meet the criteria......
  • Com. v. Bensinger
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 21 Junio 2004

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT