Com. v. Heresko
| Decision Date | 09 February 1977 |
| Citation | 28 Pa.Cmwlth. 508,368 A.2d 1357 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. James HERESKO, Jr., Appellant. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court |
Lawrence Sager, Sager & Sager Associates, Pottstown, for appellant.
John L. Heaton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Transportation, Harrisburg, for appellee.
Before CRUMLISH, Jr., MENCER and BLATT, JJ.
On July 8, 1974, James Heresko, Jr., was placed under arrest and charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Thereafter he was helped to a patrol vehicle and taken to a local police station. There a request that he submit to a breathalyzer test under Section 624.1 of The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, As amended, 75 P.S. § 624.1, 1 was refused.
The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety, suspended Heresko's license for six months. Heresko appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, averring that he 'should not be subject to a suspension'. The lower court, however, disagreed, and it affirmed the suspension.
Heresko has appealed to this Court, contending that the Commonwealth did not meet its burden of proof before the court below because it did not offer evidence that the breathalyzer test would have been administered by a qualified person using authorized equipment. We agree with the court below that such an offer is not necessary.
We have previously held that, in order to sustain a license suspension under Section 624.1, the Commonwealth must prove that (1) the defendant was placed under arrest and (2) charged with the operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, that (3) he was requested to submit to a breathalyzer test, and that (4) he refused to do so. Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Drugotch, 9 Pa.Cmwlth. 460, 308 A.2d 183 (1973); Commonwealth v. Miles, 8 Pa.Cmwlth. 544, 304 A.2d 704 (1973). In Boyle v. Bureau of Traffic Safety, 19 Pa.Cmwlth. 22, 339 A.2d 834 (1975), we held that whether the test would have been administered by qualified personnel on approved equipment is not at issue where the test has been refused. Once the requirements in Miles, supra, have been met, the defendant's license may properly be suspended. Since we find both that Boyle controls and that the four requirements for sustaining a license suspension have been met, we must uphold the suspension.
Order affirmed.
AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 1977, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, dated October 10, 1975, is affirmed.
1 Section 624.1 provides in pertinent part:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wolfe v. State ex rel. Dept. of Public Safety
...statute considered in Moran also had the same scheme as Section 754(F)(2) of the Oklahoma statute. See Commissioner v. Heresko, 28 Pa.Cmwlth. 508, 368 A.2d 1357, 1358 (1977). ¶ 18 Section 754(F)(2) is unambiguous in its provisions for what is necessary to prove in order to revoke a license ......
-
Bender v. Com.
... ... 22, 339 A.2d 834 (1975). Once the test has been refused, the adequacy of the machine and its operator is irrelevant. See Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Andreoli, --- Pa.Commonwealth Ct. ---, 507 A.2d 919 (1986); Commonwealth v. Heresko, 28 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 508, 368 A.2d 1357 (1977) ... We conclude that this rule operates in the instant case to vitiate Appellant's asserted justification for his refusal to submit. To avoid the mandatory one-year suspension under Section 1547(b), Appellant must therefore ... ...
-
Halloway v. Martin
...relevant in an implied consent suspension hearing. 1 A Pennsylvania appellate court reached a similar result in Commonwealth v. Heresko, 28 Pa.Cmwlth. 508, 368 A.2d 1357 (1977). In that case, the defendant argued that the State of Pennsylvania was required to show, in a suspension hearing, ......
-
Malveaux v. Colorado Dept. of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Div., 85CA0410
... ... 142, 519 P.2d 332 (1974); see also Halloway v. Martin, 143 Ariz. 311, 693 P.2d 966 (1984); Commonwealth v. Heresko, 28 Pa.Commw. 508, 368 A.2d ... ...