Com. v. Martorano
| Decision Date | 30 January 1969 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Francis T. MARTORANO. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Alfred P. Farese, Everett, for defendant.
John T. Gaffney, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the Commonwealth.
Before WILKINS, C.J., and SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL, and REARDON, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
At a trial under G.L. c. 278, §§ 33A--33G, of an indictment charging murder in the second degree of Maximiano Barretto, the defendant Martorano was found guilty of manslaughter. Of the argued assigned errors only a few merit even summary comment. Whether to propound a question to prospective jurors on the hypothesis that the defendant might not take the stand was in the discretion of the judge and not matter of right. G.L. c. 234, § 28. Commonwealth v. Taylor, 327 Mass. 641, 647, 100 N.E.2d 22. See Commonwealth v. Kiernan, 348 Mass. 29, 35--36, 201 N.E.2d 504. The evidence showed that on June 17, 1967, shortly after midnight, a series of arguments and fights involving the deceased and two men other than the defendant took place in the Ebbtide, a nightclub in Revere. The defendant was restrained from participating. Shortly thereafter the three men and the defendant went to a nearby parking lot where they 'squared off.' Out of a welter of conflicting testimony the jury could find that the defendant drew a pistol and fired two bullets at Barretto, Killing him. Malice could be inferred from the act. Commonwealth v. Young, 326 Mass. 597, 600, 96 N.E.2d 133. The successive motions for a directed verdict were rightly denied. On another version of the evidence, if believed, a verdict of manslaughter was permissible. The defendant did not request the judge to rule that it was not. The issue was properly left to the jury. Commonwealth v. Kendrick, 351 Mass. 203, 218 N.E.2d 408. The judge's charge, though general, was complete and correct in all essentials, including manslaughter. This being so, he was not required to charge on any 'particular possible states of facts' or to frame his instructions in a form requested by counsel. Commonwealth v. Payne, 307 Mass. 56, 58, 29 N.E.2d 709. Commonwealth v. Rogers, 351 Mass. 522, 532, 222 N.E.2d 766. No error has been shown in the rulings on evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Sinnott
...instructions in any particular form of words, so long as all necessary instructions are given in adequate words. Commonwealth v. Martorano, 355 Mass. 790, 244 N.E.2d 725 (1969). The judge instructed the jury at length on the definition of "dangerous weapons," leaving a clear impression that......
-
Com. v. Smith
...22; Commonwealth v. Geagan, 339 Mass. 487, 503, 159 N.E.2d 870; Commonwealth v. Nassar, 351 Mass. 37, 40--41, 218 N.E.2d 72; Commonwealth v. Martorano, 355 Mass. ---, a 244 N.E.2d This rule has been applied in several cases upholding the trial judge's refusal to ask prospective jurors quest......
-
Com. v. Bumpus
...exact language requested by him since the instructions, taken as a whole, conveyed the meaning established by law. Commonwealth v. Martorano, 355 Mass. 790, 244 N.E.2d 725. See Commonwealth v. Webster, 5 Cush. 295, 11. The defendant next contends that the judge erred in expressing his opini......
-
Com. v. Torres
...are given in adequate words. Commonwealth v. Sinnott, 399 Mass. 863, 878, 507 N.E.2d 699 (1987), citing Commonwealth v. Martorano, 355 Mass. 790, 244 N.E.2d 725 (1969). Although the judge may not have used the particular words requested by the defendant, he adequately explained the concept ......