Com. v. McCauley
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts |
Writing for the Court | Before WILKINS; KIRK |
Citation | 246 N.E.2d 425,355 Mass. 554 |
Decision Date | 07 April 1969 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. Lawrence J. McCAULEY. |
Page 425
v.
Lawrence J. McCAULEY.
Decided April 7, 1969.
[355 Mass. 555] Robert A. Stanziani, Boston, Mass., for defendant.
Robert M. Mardirosian, Asst. Dist. Atty. (Ruth I. Abrams, Asst. Dist. Atty., with him), for the Commonwealth.
Before [355 Mass. 554] WILKINS, C.J., and CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL and REARDON, JJ.
[355 Mass. 555] KIRK, Justice.
Upon an indictment charging murder the defendant McCauley was found guilty of
Page 426
murder in the second degree at a trial subject to G.L. c. 278, §§ 33A--33G. The case is here on his appeal with assignments of error.We state the evidence, consisting mainly of eyewitness testimony, which bears upon the issues sought to be raised by the appeal. Shortly after 10:30 P.M. on November 24, 1967, three young men, Alexander Gedutis (the deceased), Brian Johnson and William J. Sullivan were walking on the ramp which leads to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) station at Charles Street, Boston. 1 [355 Mass. 556] Earlier in the day Johnson had driven to Boston from Concord, New Hampshire. He met Gedutis in Boston in the afternoon. The two met Sullivan on Charles Street about 10:30 P.M. Gedutis knew Sullivan; Johnson did not. Gedutis was eighteen years old; Johnson and Sullivan were seventeen and nineteen years old, respectively, at the time of the trial. The three young men intended to take an MBTA train to Cambridge. Someone from the street called out 'Sully!' It was McCauley, who ran up the ramp and joined the group. McCauley knew Sullivan but not the others. 2 There were some signs that McCauley had been drinking. After introductions the four proceeded by subway to Central Square, Cambridge. On the way Sullivan, McCauley and Gedutis finished the remaining half of a one-half pint of anisette which Sullivan had purchased and partly consumed with two other friends earlier in the evening. From Central Square the group walked to Sullivan's Living quarters at nearby Columbia Street, Cambridge.
Upon arrival at Sullivan's room, the group looked at pictures of nudes on the walls and ceiling. A marihuana cigarette was rolled and smoked by all. Sullivan saw McCauley remove an automatic pistol from the bureau drawer where Sullivan kept it. He told McCauley that the gun was loaded. Sullivan and McCauley were seated beside one another on the bed. The other two were seated on chairs facing them. McCauley was just looking at the gun. Then he pressed the hammer back, pointed the weapon at Sullivan's head and squeezed the trigger. The gun did not fire. It did not fire because, although the magazine clip was fully loaded with live ammunition, there was no bullet in the chamber. Sullivan took the gun away from McCauley. He removed the clip from the handle and placed it on his bed near or under the pillow. McCauley said something like, 'Don't you trust me?' to Sullivan, who thereupon gave him the pistol, then empty. For a while, McCauley was 'fooling around' with the empty gun.
[355 Mass. 557] Thereafter, Sullivan heard the click of the clip being inserted into the gun. He saw McCauley then point the gun toward the floor and pull the slide back and release it. McCauley raised the gun, pointing it at Gedutis. Sullivan saw pressure being exerted by McCauley's finger on the trigger. He could tell by the red and white blotches. The gun fired and Gedutis fell forward clutching his chest. McCauley laughed. Sullivan took the gun from him and unloaded it. McCauley lifted Gedutis' head, put his hand over his mouth and said, 'Let's put a bullet in his head, let's not leave any witnesses.'
Sullivan took a suitcase and left with McCauley and Johnson. Gedutis was abandoned as dead. The three young men went by cab first to the Greyhound Bus Terminal in Boston and then to the dwelling of a friend of McCauley, Ralph Iamondi. They all wanted Iamondi to give them a ride to New York. Sullivan told Iamondi what had occurred at his apartment. Iamondi then left to go upstairs to talk to his wife. In his absence McCauley said to Sullivan, 'Give me the bullets to the gun, I'm going upstairs and I'm going to wipe
Page 427
out Ralph and his wife and the kid.' Later Iamondi and the three young men drove around in Iamondi's car. Sullivan repeated to Iamondi the story of what had happened in the apartment. At this point McCauley laughed and said, 'Don't believe him.' The four then drove to Castle Island where Sullivan, over McCauley's protest, threw the weapon and the clip into the harbor. They were later recovered by the police.There was no evidence of any unpleasantness or anger or fights prior to the shooting.
At the close of the Commonwealth's case the defendant moved for a directed verdict of not guilty, which was denied. At a conference then held with counsel the judge stated that he thought the evidence did not warrant submitting the issue of manslaughter, whether voluntary or involuntary, to the jury. The defendant's counsel replied that he understood. Later in the conference the judge said, in part, to counsel: '(I)f there is any evidence of any kind that you [355 Mass. 558] think warrants submission on the issue of manslaughter to the jury, will you give ti to me or point it out to me before 2 o'clock. * * * (T) here is a complete vacuum of the elements of voluntary manslaughter * * * (and) the evidence of involuntary manslaughter was suggested only in the form of the questions which were never adopted by a witness. * * * (T)hat's the way I read his evidence.' The prosecution stated that there was nothing to warrant submitting the issue...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. French
...354 Mass. 630, 633--635, 241 N.E.2d 809. Cf. Commonwealth v. McCauley, 355 Mass. ---, --- - --- (Mass.Adv.Sh. (1969) 511, 513--517), 246 N.E.2d 425. A--41. The judge charged that, 'once there is a conspiracy in existence, anything that any member of the conspiracy does or says in furtheranc......
-
Com. v. Edgerly
...249] were claiming. He did not withdraw from the jury the critical issue of Tremblay's credibility, contrast Commonwealth v. McCauley, 355 Mass. 554, 560, 246 N.E.2d 425 (1969), nor did he tell them that the witness did not feel intimidated. He merely told the jury that the prosecutor's con......
-
Com. v. Campbell
...Mass. ---, --- C, 376 N.E.2d 872 (1978). Commonwealth v. Caine,366 Mass. 366, 373, 318 N.E.2d 901 (1974). Commonwealth v. McCauley, 355 Mass. 554, 559, 246 N.E.2d 425 (1969). The indivisible phrase of art "malice aforethought" describes the particular mental state accompanying a homicide wh......
-
Com. v. Edgerly
...Page 649 of the prosecution's witnesses" because of those questions and answers. Commonwealth v. [13 Mass.App.Ct. 575] McCauley, 355 Mass. 554, 560, 246 N.E.2d 425 (1969). Contrast Commonwealth v. Barros, 5 Mass.App. 887, 369 N.E.2d 464 7. The defendant contends that it was error to admit t......
-
Com. v. French
...354 Mass. 630, 633--635, 241 N.E.2d 809. Cf. Commonwealth v. McCauley, 355 Mass. ---, --- - --- (Mass.Adv.Sh. (1969) 511, 513--517), 246 N.E.2d 425. A--41. The judge charged that, 'once there is a conspiracy in existence, anything that any member of the conspiracy does or says in furtheranc......
-
Com. v. Edgerly
...249] were claiming. He did not withdraw from the jury the critical issue of Tremblay's credibility, contrast Commonwealth v. McCauley, 355 Mass. 554, 560, 246 N.E.2d 425 (1969), nor did he tell them that the witness did not feel intimidated. He merely told the jury that the prosecutor's con......
-
Com. v. Campbell
...Mass. ---, --- C, 376 N.E.2d 872 (1978). Commonwealth v. Caine,366 Mass. 366, 373, 318 N.E.2d 901 (1974). Commonwealth v. McCauley, 355 Mass. 554, 559, 246 N.E.2d 425 (1969). The indivisible phrase of art "malice aforethought" describes the particular mental state accompanying a homicide wh......
-
Com. v. Edgerly
...Page 649 of the prosecution's witnesses" because of those questions and answers. Commonwealth v. [13 Mass.App.Ct. 575] McCauley, 355 Mass. 554, 560, 246 N.E.2d 425 (1969). Contrast Commonwealth v. Barros, 5 Mass.App. 887, 369 N.E.2d 464 7. The defendant contends that it was error to admit t......