Com. v. Meas

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Writing for the CourtBefore BELL; EAGEN; BELL
Citation415 Pa. 41,202 A.2d 74
Decision Date01 July 1964
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Joseph John MEAS, Appellant.

Page 74

202 A.2d 74
415 Pa. 41
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Joseph John MEAS, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 1, 1964.

R. Solomon Bear, Edward G. Wink, Reading, for appellant.

[415 Pa. 42] W. Richard Eshelman, Dist. Atty., Reading, for appellee.

[415 Pa. 41] Before BELL, C. J., and COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.

[415 Pa. 42] EAGEN, Justice.

Joseph John Meas, the appellant, twenty-seven years of age, after trial, was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree. Punishment was fixed at death. Following the denial of post trial motions and imposition of sentence in accordance with the jury's verdict, this appeal was filed.

From the evidence offered by the Commonwealth, the jury could find the following facts:

On August 8, 1962, about ten o'clock p. m., the defendant accosted Janis Chmielewski, aged fourteen years, at a drinking fountain on the Glenside Playground in the City of Reading. He choked her into unconsciousness and removed all of her clothing. Some blocks away, he took a chaise lounge 1 from a residential carport, placed the unconscious girl thereon and proceeded to wheel the lounge towards a fairway of the golf course of the Berkshire Country Club. He proceeded down Berkshire Drive through a

Page 75

highly populated area for several blocks, but seeing people in the area, turned off onto a dirt road which ran along the edge of the golf course and led to the Schuylkill River. In the darkness, he failed to see an abrupt turn in the roadway and fell, together with the lounge, down a steep slope or embankment running along the westerly side of the river. He then removed his own clothing, placed the unconscious girl on the mattress portion of the lounge and walked into the river pushing the mattress with him.

[415 Pa. 43] In the meantime, the police were called by one of the individuals in the neighborhood who had seen the defendant wheeling the lounge down Berkshire Drive. When the officers arrived on the bank of the river, the defendant was observed standing out some distance in the water. He was then seen returning to the westerly bank, retrieving his closting, and wading out again into the river. The police fired a warning shot. The defendant was next seen momentarily pausing at the spot where he had first been observed, kicking his legs up and down, and then hurrying to the opposite bank of the river and disappearing into the darkness.

A search of the river disclosed the presence of the mattress a short distance down stream. Later on, the lifeless, naked body of the victim was found face down in the water in the area of the river where the defendant had first been observed.

A medical examination and autopsy on the body disclosed: the presence of multiple lacerations, abrasions and scratches; several marks at the base of the throat indicating pressure had been applied before death in the area of the windpipe to stop respiration; discoloration around the nipples of the breast; and traces of blood underneath the fingernails. The cause of death was drowning. 2 She had not been sexually assaulted.

The defendant was taken into custody at his home within a short time. He bore scratches on his legs, arms and chest which were of recent origin.

The defense at trial was legal insanity. 3 A qualified psychiatrist testified that Meas suffered from [415 Pa. 44] schizophrenia and pseudo neurosis; that the illness was a long duration; that on the night in question he suffered a complete breakdown and did not appreciate the quality of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 practice notes
  • Com. v. Campbell
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • April 27, 1967
    ...v. Oddy, 16 App.Div.2d 585, 229 N.Y.S.2d 983; State of Ohio v. Loudermill, 2 Ohio St.2d 79, 206 N.E.2d 198. See Commonwealth v. Meas, 415 Pa. 41, 44-45, 202 A.2d The judge withdrew from the consideration of the jury the possibility of a conviction of murder committed with deliberately preme......
  • Com. v. Moore
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • October 3, 1975
    ...(opinion announcing the judgment); Commonwealth v Schmidt, 423 Pa. 432, 441, 224 A.2d 625, 629--30 (1966) (dictum); Commonwealth v. Meas, 415 Pa. 41, 44--46, 202 A.2d 74, 75--76 (1964) (alternate holding); Commonwealth v. Turner, 367, Pa. 403, 407--09, 80 A.2d 708, 711 (1951) (alternate hol......
  • Com. v. Cain
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • January 28, 1977
    ...Pa. 102, 109 n. 7, 317 A.2d 258, 261 n. 7 (1974); Commonwealth v. Beach, 438 Pa. 37, 40, 264 A.2d 712, 714 (1970); Commonwealth v. Meas, 415 Pa. 41, 45, 202 A.2d 74, 76 (1964); Commonwealth v. Frazier, 411 Pa. 195, 205, 191 A.2d 369, 374 (1963); Commonwealth v. Malone, 354 Pa. 180, 187--88,......
  • Com. v. Heckathorn
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • April 24, 1968
    ...v. Steele, 362 Pa. 427, 66 A.2d 825; Commonwealth v. Schmidt, 423 Pa. 432, 224 A.2d 625; Commonwealth v. Meas, 415 Pa. [429 Pa. 538] 41, 202 A.2d 74; Rhodes v. Commonwealth, 48 Pa. 396; Lane v. Commonwealth, 59 Pa. 371; see also, Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, 18 P.S. § 4701. Relying there......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
29 cases
  • Com. v. Campbell
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • April 27, 1967
    ...v. Oddy, 16 App.Div.2d 585, 229 N.Y.S.2d 983; State of Ohio v. Loudermill, 2 Ohio St.2d 79, 206 N.E.2d 198. See Commonwealth v. Meas, 415 Pa. 41, 44-45, 202 A.2d The judge withdrew from the consideration of the jury the possibility of a conviction of murder committed with deliberately preme......
  • Com. v. Moore
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • October 3, 1975
    ...(opinion announcing the judgment); Commonwealth v Schmidt, 423 Pa. 432, 441, 224 A.2d 625, 629--30 (1966) (dictum); Commonwealth v. Meas, 415 Pa. 41, 44--46, 202 A.2d 74, 75--76 (1964) (alternate holding); Commonwealth v. Turner, 367, Pa. 403, 407--09, 80 A.2d 708, 711 (1951) (alternate hol......
  • Com. v. Cain
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • January 28, 1977
    ...Pa. 102, 109 n. 7, 317 A.2d 258, 261 n. 7 (1974); Commonwealth v. Beach, 438 Pa. 37, 40, 264 A.2d 712, 714 (1970); Commonwealth v. Meas, 415 Pa. 41, 45, 202 A.2d 74, 76 (1964); Commonwealth v. Frazier, 411 Pa. 195, 205, 191 A.2d 369, 374 (1963); Commonwealth v. Malone, 354 Pa. 180, 187--88,......
  • Com. v. Heckathorn
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • April 24, 1968
    ...v. Steele, 362 Pa. 427, 66 A.2d 825; Commonwealth v. Schmidt, 423 Pa. 432, 224 A.2d 625; Commonwealth v. Meas, 415 Pa. [429 Pa. 538] 41, 202 A.2d 74; Rhodes v. Commonwealth, 48 Pa. 396; Lane v. Commonwealth, 59 Pa. 371; see also, Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, 18 P.S. § 4701. Relying there......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT