Com. v. Wolfe

CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtBefore NIX; PER CURIAM; LARSEN
CitationCom. v. Wolfe, 537 A.2d 1370, 517 Pa. 406 (Pa. 1988)
Decision Date29 February 1988
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. James WOLFE, Appellee.

Stuart Suss, Director of Appeals, West Chester, for appellant.

John J. Stanzione, Sara R. Nichols, Timothy I. Melvin, West Chester, for appellee.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

ORDER OF COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

LARSEN, J., dissents.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Com. v. Ahlborn
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • July 31, 1996
    ...Wolfe, 349 Pa.Super. 415, 419, 503 A.2d 435, 437 (1986), allocatur granted, 514 Pa. 617, 521 A.2d 932 (1986), appeal dismissed, 517 Pa. 406, 537 A.2d 1370 (1988). Id. at 299-300, 621 A.2d at 992. Pennsylvania's criminal and sentencing statutes, which have detailed guidelines for sentencing ......
  • Com. v. Dickerson
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • May 8, 1991
    ... ... & C. 351 (1948) ], and can be extrapolated as well from section 303.7(g) [of the sentencing guidelines] as from previous statutory provisions ...         Id. 349 Pa.Super. at 589-93, 504 A.2d at 201-03 (footnotes [404 Pa.Super. 260] omitted). 4 See also Commonwealth v. Wolfe, 349 Pa.Super. 415, 503 A.2d 435 (1986), allocatur granted, 514 Pa. 617, 521 A.2d 932 (1986), appeal dismissed, 517 Pa. 406, 537 A.2d 1370 ... Page 772 ... (1987). Accord Commonwealth v. Becker, 366 Pa.Super. 54, 64-65, 530 A.2d 888, 893-94 (1987) (en banc), allocatur denied, 520 Pa. 586, 551 ... ...
  • Com. v. Beatty
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • January 21, 1992
    ...Commonwealth v. Wolfe, 349 Pa.Super. 415, 503 A.2d 435, appeal granted, 514 Pa. 617, 521 A.2d 932, (1986), appeal dismissed, 517 Pa. 406, 537 A.2d 1370 (1988) (conviction for enhancing offense pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9714(b) requires that conviction for enhancing offense antedate commissio......
  • Com. v. Nellom
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • November 13, 1989
    ...in prior record score calculations) (emphasis added), allocatur granted, 514 Pa. 617, 521 A.2d 932 (1986) appeal dismissed, 517 Pa. 406, 537 A.2d 1370 (1987); but see Commonwealth v. Phillips, 374 Pa.Super. 219, 542 A.2d 575 (1988).10 The Commonwealth argues that limited information concern......
  • Get Started for Free