Comfort ex rel. Neumyer v. Lynn School Committee
Decision Date | 06 June 2003 |
Docket Number | No. C.A.01-10365-NG.,No. C.A.99-11811-NG.,C.A.99-11811-NG.,C.A.01-10365-NG. |
Citation | 263 F.Supp.2d 209 |
Parties | Samantha J. COMFORT, on behalf of her minor child and friend, Elizabeth NEUMYER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LYNN SCHOOL COMMITTEE, et al., Defendants, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant-Intervenor. Todd Bollen, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lynn School Committee, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
263 F.Supp.2d 209
Samantha J. COMFORT, on behalf of her minor child and friend, Elizabeth NEUMYER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LYNN SCHOOL COMMITTEE, et al., Defendants, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant-Intervenor.
Todd Bollen, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lynn School Committee, et al., Defendants.
No. C.A.99-11811-NG.
No. C.A.01-10365-NG.
United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
June 6, 2003.
Chester Darling, Boston, MA, for Plaintiffs.
John C. Mihos, Lynn, MA, for Lynn School Committee, Patricia Capano, Frank M. Carrabba, Steven F. Duffy, George Mazareas, William McDonald, Timothy Mc-Manus, Madelyn Barry, Donna Coppola, Carolyn Murphy, Loretta Cuffe O'Donnell Patricia A. Crutchfield, Edwin J. Delattre defendants.
George S. Markopoulos, City Solicitor' Office, Lynn, MA, for City of Lynn, defendant. M.A, for Patrick J. Mc Manus, defendant.
John C. Mihos, Lynn, MA, George S. Markopoulos, City Solicitor's Office, Lynn, MA, for Patrick J. McManus, defendant.
Richard W. Cole, John R. Hitt, Attorney General's Office, Boston, M.A, for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, defendant.
Ranjana A. Chand Burke, Attorney General's Office, Boston, M.A, for James Peyser, Robert Schaefer, William K. Irwin, Jr., Abigail Thernstrom, defendants.
Ross Wiener, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for U.S., defendant.
Norman J. Chachkin, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., Nadine M. Cohen, Lawyers Committee for Civ. Rights, for Pamela Freeman, Barbara Murkison, Anthony Murkison, Northshore Chapter of Nat. Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People, defendants.
GERTNER, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..................................................213 II.PROCEDURAL HISTORY................................................215 A. The Comfort Litigation............................................216 1. Parties...................................................216 2. Preliminary Injunction ...................................216 3. Motions to Dismiss........................................217 B. The Bollen Litigation........................................217 III. TRIAL...........................................................218 A. Plaintiffs'Case..............................................218 B. Defendants'Case..............................................219 1. The Administrators: ....................................219 2. The Parents and Students:...............................220 3. Defendants'Experts:.....................................220 C. Plaintiffs'Rebuttal..........................................221 IV. FINDINGS OF FACT.................................................222 A. The Racial Imbalance Act.....................................222 B. Racial Imbalance in Lynn's Public Schools....................224 1. 1977: The First Warning.................................225 2. 1979: Washington, the First Magnet School...............225 3. 1980s: Profound Changes in Lynn.........................225 4. 1986: A Series of Failed Voluntary Plans................226 5. 1987-1988: Greater Imbalance; More Accusations..........226 6. 1988-1990: Drafting the Current Plan.............................227 C. The Current Plan.............................................228 D. Continuous Monitoring........................................230 E. A Current Snapshot of the Lynn School District...............230 1. Residential Segregation and Geographical Separation...230 2. "White Flight" and Its Decline after Implementation of the Lynn Plan...............................................230 3. Racial Balance or Imbalance............................231 4. The Special Problem of Poverty.........................232 5. School Construction and Renovation.....................232 6. "Magnet" Schools.......................................232 F. The Lynn Schools at Present...................................232 1. Observations by Participants.........................233
2. Expert Testimony...............................................................233 a. Dr. Orfield: Desegregation Expert.......................................234 b. Drs. Dovidio and Killen: Social Psychologists...........................236 (1) Intergroup Contact Theory.......................................236 (2) "Critical Mass".................................................237 (3) Impact of Resegregation ........................................238 c. Nancy McArdle: Limitations Imposed by the Demographics in Lynn...................................................................238 d. Plaintiffs' Rebuttal..................................................239 LEGAL ANALYSIS ...............................................................................240 A. Jurisdictional Issues .................................................................240 1. Amendments to Prior Decisions (Comfort Plaintiffs)..............................240 2. Partial Motion to Dismiss (Bollen Plaintiffs) ..................................241 a. Claims for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief............................241 b. Nominal Damages.........................................................243 B. Equal Protection.......................................................................243 1. Strict or Intermediate Scrutiny?.................................................244 2. Facial Challenge to the Racial Imbalance Act.....................................246 3. The Strict Scrutiny Standard ....................................................249 a. Compelling State Interest................................................249 b. Narrow Tailoring.........................................................251 (1) Are the means necessary; are there adequate race-neutral alternatives?................................................251 (2) Is the policy proportional to the compelling interest ...........251 (3) What Is the Impact on Third Parties? ............................253 (4) Miscellaneous Concerns: Deference to School Boards' "Narrow Tailoring........................................................253 4. The Goals of the Plan ..........................................................255 a. Curricular Goals: "Promoting Racial and Ethnic Diversity," "Increasing Educational Opportunities for All Students and Improving the Quality of Education," "Ensuring Safety"..................255 (1) Are These Curricular Goals Compelling State Interests? ..........255 (2) Is the Plan Narrowly Tailored to These Compelling Interests ........................................................256 (a) Are the Plan's Means Necessary to Achieve its Ends?.......256 (b) Proportionality of the Means..............................257 (c) Minimal Burden on Third Parties; the Issue of Stigma......257 (3) Plaintiffs' Arguments Do Not Apply in Lynn......................259 (a) a White/nonwhite Distinction Is Appropriate...............259 (b) Additional Resources Would Not Have Been Adequate to Accomplish the Curricular Goals; the Significance of "Critical Mass".......................................260 b. Remedying the Effects of De Facto Segregation: "Reducing Minority Isolation"....................................................264 (1) Is this Remedial Interest Compelling?...........................264 (2) Is the Lynn Plan Narrowly Tailored to this Compelling Interest?....................................................266 (3) Race-Neutral Alternatives are not Feasible......................267 c. Interest (5): "Providing an Education to All Students that Satisfies Federal and State Constitutional Requirements"................269 (1) The Command and Promise of Brown v. Board of Edu cation ......................................................269 (2) State Constitutional Requirements..............................271 C. Other Federal Claims........................................................272 1. TitleVI..............................................................272 2. 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ...............................................272 3. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986 ...................................273 D. Article 111 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights......................273
1. Applicable...
To continue reading
Request your trialSubscribers can access the reported version of this case.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see a list of all the cited cases and legislation of a document.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see a list of all the documents that have cited the case.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see the revised versions of legislation with amendments.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see any amendments made to the case.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see a visualisation of a case and its relationships to other cases. An alternative to lists of cases, the Precedent Map makes it easier to establish which ones may be of most relevance to your research and prioritise further reading. You also get a useful overview of how the case was received.

Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see the list of results connected to your document through the topics and citations Vincent found.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.