Comiskey v. Arlen

Citation401 N.Y.S.2d 200,43 N.Y.2d 696
Parties, 372 N.E.2d 34 Mitchell COMISKEY, an infant, by Leo Comiskey, his guardian, et al., Appellants, v. Myron ARLEN et al., Respondents, Louis J. Lefkowitz, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Intervenor-Respondent.
Decision Date17 November 1977
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, with costs. The formal written recommendation of the medical malpractice panel should not be suppressed on pretrial application. It was premature prior to trial, which might never take place, and which, if it does, might not give rise to considering the issue. And even if the issue arises, it might not result in prejudice to plaintiff. Moreover, issues of constitutionality should not be reached unnecessarily (cf., e. g., Matter of Peters v. New York City Housing Auth., 307 N.Y. 519, 527-528, 121 N.E.2d 529, 531, 532). If after trial, and despite the panel's recommendation of no liability, plaintiff recovers a large judgment, it might no longer matter whether section 148-a of the Judiciary Law establishing the panels deprives a plaintiff of any constitutional rights, or, constitutionality aside, whether the panel made an improper determination on an inadequate basis.

BREITEL, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and COOKE, JJ., concur.

FUCHSBERG, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • Barrett v. Baird
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • December 19, 1995
    ...it would evaluate any other expert opinion." 5 Comiskey v. Arlen, 55 A.D.2d 304, 390 N.Y.S.2d 122, 126 (1976), aff'd 43 N.Y.2d 696, 401 N.Y.S.2d 200, 372 N.E.2d 34 (1977). In Nevada, as in most jurisdictions, experts may rely on evidence that is otherwise inadmissible at a trial even when t......
  • Attorney General v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 1978
    ...objectivity, or follow a trial court's instructions regarding the weight to be given it"), aff'd on other grounds, 43 N.Y.2d 696, 401 N.Y.S.2d 200, 372 N.E.2d 34 (1977). The law is clearly contrary to the appellees' contention. For recent cases of our sister states holding that statutory pr......
  • Beatty v. Akron City Hospital
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • August 12, 1981
    ...* * * " See, also, Comiskey v. Arlen (1976), 55 App.Div.2d 304, 390 N.Y.Supp.2d 122, affirmed on other grounds (1977), 43 N.Y.2d 696, 401 N.Y.S.2d 200, 372 N.E.2d 34. In a similar vein, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Meeker v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. (1915), 236 U.S. 412, 35 S.C......
  • People v. Kleber
    • United States
    • New York Justice Court
    • February 8, 1996
    ...on constitutional grounds, where non-constitutional grounds will suffice to determine the issues. Comiskey v. Arlen, 43 N.Y.2d 696, 698, 401 N.Y.S.2d 200, 372 N.E.2d 34; People v. Furlong, 129 Misc.2d 938, 494 N.Y.S.2d 653. Thus, the Court should first determine whether CPL 30.30, applies t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT