Comm'rs Of Greene County v. Murphy
Decision Date | 20 October 1890 |
Citation | 12 S.E. 122,107 N.C. 36 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | Commissioners of Greene County et al. v. Murphy et al. |
Collection of Taxes—Remedies.
The mode of collecting taxes being prescribed and pointed out by statute, an action in equity cannot be maintained by a county to enforce the recovery of taxes until the statutory remedies shall be exhausted.
Appeal from superior court, Greene county; E. T. Boykin, Judge.
This action is brought by the board of commissioners of the county of Greene to enforce the collection of certain alleged arrearages of taxes due that county for the years 1881 to 1886, inclusive, levied upon certain real estate specified, the property (at the time of such levy) of the defendantJohn Murphy, and charged against him, parts of which he has since sold to other defendants, and to enforce the alleged lien of such tuxes imposed upon the real estate mentioned.It is alleged in the complaint that so much of the taxes levied upon the land as were due to the state were paid; that so much of the same as were due the said county, or a considerable part thereof, have not been paid; that judgments for the same against the sheriff of that county, charged with the collection of such taxes, and the sureties to his official bonds, were obtained in favor of said county; that parts of these judgments have been paid, and other parts thereof remain unpaid.It is not alleged that the sureties of the said sheriff, against whom judgments were taken, are insolvent, or that such balances unpaid could not be collected from them by execution.Another sheriff was afterwards charged, in 1888, to collect from the defendant Murphy the alleged arrearages of taxes, but he desisted from so doing upon the ground that said Murphy made affidavit, as allowed by statute, that he had paid such taxes to the former sheriff; but the plaintiffs allege that there was no such payment in fact.The complaint demands judgment against the defendant Murphy for the amount of such taxes unpaid; that the same be declared to be alien upon the real estate mentioned; that the same be sold; and for general relief.The defendants demur to the complaint, and assign as grounds of demurrer, among other things, that the plaintiffs have no capacity in law or authority to bring or maintain the action; that the court has no jurisdiction to entertain the action; that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, etc.The court sustained the demurrer and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Kansas City And Travelers Insurance Co. v. Field
...or extraordinary remedy for its enforcement," saying such liens could not be enforced in courts of equity. In Greene County v. Murphy, 107 N.C. 36, 12 S.E. 122, Supreme Court of North Carolina spoke dubiously regarding whether a lien for taxes could be made good in equity, even when a metho......
-
Garysburg Mfg. Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Pender County
... ... Wolfenden v. Com'rs [of Beaufort County] 152 ... N.C. page 83 [67 S.E. 319]; Com'rs [of Greene County] ... v. Murphy, 107 N.C. page 36 [12 S.E. 122]; Wade v ... [Craven County] Com'rs, 74 ... ...
-
New Hanover County v. Whiteman
...Guilford v. Georgia Co., 112 N. C. 34, 17 S. E. 10, 19 L. R. A. 485; Wilmington v. Bryan, 141 N. C. 666, 54 S. C. 543; Commissioners v. Murphy, 107 N. C. 38, 12 S. E. 122; Graded School v. McDowell, 157 N. C. 317, 72 S. E. 1083; Commissioners v. Hall, 177 N. C. 490, 99 S. E. 372. The plaint......
-
Kansas City v. Field
...or extraordinary remedy for its enforcement" saying such liens could not be enforced in courts of equity. In Greene County v. Murphy, 107 N. C. 36, 12 S. E. 122, the Supreme Court of North Carolina spoke dubiously regarding whether a lien for taxes could be made good in equity, even when a ......