Commercial Acetylene Co. v. Schroeder
Decision Date | 07 January 1913 |
Docket Number | 1,950. |
Citation | 203 F. 276 |
Parties | COMMERCIAL ACETYLENE CO. et al. v. SCHROEDER et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
John P Bartlett, Clarence Winter, and Keyes Winter, all of New York City, and Charles H. Hamill, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.
Robert H. Parkinson, of Chicago, Ill. (John S. Miller, Merritt Starr, and Wallace R. Lane, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellees.
Before BAKER and SEAMAN, Circuit Judges, and HUMPHREY, District Judge.
A considerable volume of prior litigation on the patent in suit is to be found in the books, but this is the first case in which the defenses here presented appear to have had the consideration of the court.
The Court of Appeals of the Sixth Circuit, in 192 F. 321, held that it would not review the discretion of the court below in following the Milwaukee court on an application for a preliminary restraining order, but that the question of validity would be open on final hearing; and the Court of Appeals of the Eighth Circuit in Commercial Acetylene Company et al. v. Fireball, etc., Co., 198 F. 650, held that it was discretionary with the Circuit Court to grant the temporary order, that this discretion was for the Circuit Court, and not for the Court of Appeals, but that the question of validity was open for final hearing.
The patent in suit is described in claims 1, 2, and 5 as follows:
'1. A closed vessel containing a supersaturated solution of acetylene produced by forcing acetylene into a solvent under pressure; said vessel having an outlet for the acetylene gas, which escapes from the solvent when the pressure is released or reduced, and means for controlling said outlet whereby the gas may escape therethrough at substantially uniform pressure, substantially as described.
The defense is, first, noninfringement; and, second, that the patent expired prior to the suit by reason of the expiration of the British patent substantially identical with the patent in suit.
The claims of the British patent are as...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Searchlight Gas Co. v. Prest-O-Lite Co.
... ... steel bottles or tanks, equipped with regulatory outlet ... valves, and containing acetylene gas dissolved in acetone ... Empty bottles were never sold by appellee to be filled and ... used ... 720, 119 ... C.C.A. 164; Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Davis (D.C.) 209 F ... In ... Commercial Acetylene Co. v. Schroeder et al., 203 F ... 276, 121 C.C.A. 474, the present appellee as holder ... ...
-
Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Heiden
... ... Circuit Judge ... The ... Prest-O-Lite Company makes and sells packages of acetylene ... gas for supplying automobile headlights, and undertakes to ... and does furnish any owner of ... Hess patent. This patent expired June 30, 1910 ... Commercial Acetylene Co. v. Schroeder, 203 F. 276, ... 121 C.C.A. 474; Commercial Acetylene Co. v ... ...
-
Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Davis
... ... The ... Prest-O-Lite Company, a manufacturer and distributor of ... acetylene gas for lighting automobiles and other vehicles, ... brought suit to restrain alleged unfair ... have expired June 30, 1910. Commercial Acetylene Co. v ... Searchlight Gas Co., 203 F. 276, 121 C.C.A. 474 ... Complainant's ... ...
-
Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Ray
... ... , where it manufactures and prepares for sale and sells there ... and elsewhere acetylene gas in five sizes of copper-plated ... steel shells, containers, cylinders or tanks, which for ... complete package ready for commercial use. Each of the six ... specifications of the invention, as claimed by the inventors, ... and ... ( Commercial ... Acetylene Co. and Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Schroeder, 203 F ... 276.) Prior to that time the plaintiff to the extent of its ... license from the ... ...