Commercial Banking Corp. v. ONE APPROX. 30-FOOT M. BOAT, 8554.
Decision Date | 21 September 1949 |
Docket Number | No. 8554.,8554. |
Citation | 86 F. Supp. 618 |
Parties | COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION v. ONE APPROXIMATELY 30-FOOT MOTOR BOAT, et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey |
Louis B. LeDuc, Camden, N. J., James H. Molloy, Philadelphia, Pa., for libellant.
Arthur W. Lewis, Camden, N. J., Conlen, LaBrum & Beechwood, George E. Beechwood, Philadelphia, Pa. (Sundheim, Folz, Kamsler & Goodis, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for respondent Miriam L. Belber.
This was a trial of an admiralty matter wherein the libellant sought both title and possession of a 30-foot motor cruiser known as the "Three Jays" or afterwards known as the "Merlin."
The facts stated briefly as possible, are as follows: That on August 9, 1945, one Alden G. Johnson was the owner and in possession of a 30-foot Owens Cabin Cruiser, having motor number N26249 and bearing Coast Guard Certificate of Operations number 11T105; that on said date, August 9, 1945, said Alden G. Johnson sold the boat to one Howard H. Holt for the sum of $4,286.50 of which $1,300 was paid on account by Holt and the balance secured by a bailment lease executed by Holt and Johnson.
The lease called for monthly payments on account by Holt, referring to these as rentals, and further provided: 1
The form then contains a separate instrument known in Pennsylvania as a judgment note and authorizing judgment to be entered against Holt for the unpaid balance of the purchase price or rent.
The form lastly contains a printed form of assignment and on August 9, 1945 (the same date it was executed by Holt), Johnson assigned all his rights under the bailment lease to the libellant, Commercial Banking Corporation, a corporation of Pennsylvania. All the proceedings between Johnson, Holt and the Commercial took place at the Commercial's office in Philadelphia and under the supervision of George B. Rementer, the Vice President and secretary of Commercial Banking Corporation.
At the same time Johnson executed to Commercial Banking Corporation what is purported to be an absolute bill of sale for said boat. An examination of it is interesting.
Prior to the proceedings Johnson held what is known as a "Certificate of Award of Number to an Undocumented Vessel," bearing No. 11T105, issued by the U.S. Coast Guard at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. These certificates, on the face, besides describing the vessel say:
On the reverse side is printed this matter:
Below this, and also on the back, the certificate contains a form of bill of sale:
"In consideration of the sum of $1.00 (one dollar) lawful money of the United States of America, in hand paid, and other valuable considerations this ____ day of ______, I (we) ______, owner(s) of the vessel described in this certificate, hereby sell and transfer all of my (our) right, title, and interest in the same to ______ of ______."
On the 10th day of August, 1945, (the day after the execution of the bailment lease, the assignment thereof and also the purported bill of sale to Commercial), Alden G. Johnson and Howard H. Holt appeared at the office of the United States Coast Guard where Johnson surrendered his Certificate of Award of Number and executed the form of bill of sale therein contained to Howard H. Holt. Thereupon, Holt made application for the issuance of a certificate in his name, which certificate was issued by the Coast Guard on August 11, 1945, awarding the same number 11T105, to the boat.
Early in September, 1945, respondent, Miriam L. Belber, together with her husband, visited the Quaker City Boat Yard in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, seeking to purchase a boat. Eventually, they became acquainted with Holt who informed them that he was the owner of the boat in question. After some days of negotiating, during which time Holt exhibited to the Belbers the Certificate of Award in his name and also the previous certificate in Johnson's name with Johnson's signature on the bill of sale portion thereof, dated August 10, 1945, transferring title to Holt, respondent Belber agreed, on September 10, 1945, to purchase the boat from Holt and engaged the services of Allen J. Levin, Esquire, a member of the Bar of Philadelphia, who represented her in that transaction.
Levin went to the office of the Coast Guard in the Custom House at Philadelphia and there made a search of registration for the "Three Jays" and found the records to disclose the registration in the name of Howard H. Holt. In addition, Levin secured from Holt an affidavit on the same date, September 10, 1945, which stated that he was the owner of the boat; that he was transferring it to respondent Belber and that there were no liens or encumbrances against the boat.
Thereupon, Holt executed the bill of sale on the back of his Certificate of Award of Number to Mrs. Belber. She paid Holt in full with a check dated September 10, 1945, in the amount of $4,350 and made application to the Coast Guard for a Certificate in her name, which was issued on the same day. Thereupon, the Belbers took over actual possession of the boat and Holt navigated it to Atlanta City, New Jersey for the Belbers.
Shortly afterward Holt absconded defaulting upon the bailment lease with Commercial after making two payments of $125.00 each to libellant.
On January 19, 1946, libellant Commercial, entered judgment in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, against Holt in the sum of $3,178.90, representing the principal sum due plus interest and attorneys' collection fees.
On July 9, 1946, Commercial Banking Corporation filed a libel in this court seeking the recovery of possession and title of the boat. Mrs. Belber alone has responded.
Commercial alleges that Johnson, being the true owner, sold the boat to Commercial by the purported bill of sale and assignment of the bailment...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McCorkle v. First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust Co.
...The El Cuis, 107 F.Supp. 436 (E.D.N.Y. 1952); Hirsch v. The San Pablo, 81 F.Supp. 292 (D.Fla.1949); Commercial Banking Corp. v. One Approx. 30 Foot Motor Boat, 86 F.Supp. 618 (D.N.J. 1949). See also Gilmore & Black, Law of Admiralty, § 9-52 (1957); 1 Benedict, Admiralty, § 77 (6 ed. 7 See n......
-
RC Craig Limited v. Ships of Sea Incorporated
...courts of the United States. Such an instrument does not constitute a maritime contract. Commercial Banking Corporation v. One Approximately 30-Foot Motor Boat et al., 86 F.Supp. 618; North American Continental Co. v. The El Cuis, 107 F. Supp. 436; Port Welcome Cruises, Inc. v. S. S. Bay Be......
-
RC CRAIG LIMITED v. SHIPS OF THE SEA INCORPORATED
...courts of the United States. Such an instrument does not constitute a maritime contract. Commercial Banking Corporation v. One Approximately 30-Foot Motor Boat et al., D. C., 86 F.Supp. 618; North American Continental Co. v. The El Cuis, D.C., 107 F.Supp. 436; Port Welcome Cruises, Inc. v. ......