Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. Mills
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | BELL |
| Citation | Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. Mills, 216 S.E.2d 628, 134 Ga.App. 908 (Ga. App. 1975) |
| Decision Date | 29 April 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 1,No. 50420,50420,1 |
| Parties | COMMERCIAL CREDIT PLAN, INC. v. D. L. MILLS |
Smith & Portman, Ronald C. Crawford, Savannah, for appellant.
Lewis & Javetz, Emanuel Lewis, Savannah, for appellee. Syllabus Opinion by the Court
The automobile finance company has not pierced the defendant's answer that there was a substitution by judicial decree of his divorced wife as the sole debtor and a release of defendant from the obligation and that the company acquiesced in accepting the former wife as the sole obligee. See Loftis Plumbing, etc., Co. v. American Surety Co., 74 Ga.App. 590, 40 S.E.2d 667. We affirm the denial of the motion for summary judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Stratton & McLendon, Inc. v. Cameron-Brown Co.
...& Indemnity Co., 137 Ga.App. 159, 223 S.E.2d 453; Barker v. Gold Kist, Inc., 135 Ga.App. 224, 217 S.E.2d 195; Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. Mills, 134 Ga.App. 908, 216 S.E.2d 628; Price v. B-Line Systems, Inc., 129 Ga.App. 34(3), 198 S.E.2d Our ruling is that plaintiff has not met its pro......
-
Branch v. Housing Authority of City of Atlanta
... ... ANSLEY PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC ... HOUSING AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF ATLANTA et al ... ...