Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 83-1037

CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
CitationCommercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So.2d 934 (Fla. App. 1984)
Decision Date15 August 1984
Docket NumberNo. 83-1037,83-1037
PartiesCOMMERCIAL GARDEN MALL, a general partnership, Appellant, v. The SUCCESS ACADEMY, INC., a Florida corporation, and Lawrence D. Greer, individually, Appellees.

Jon Jay Ferdinand of Law Offices of Kaufman, Houchins & Ferdinand, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Spencer M. Sax and George Aslanian of Sachs & Weiss, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff's original complaint for breach of a lease was dismissed for failure to attach a copy thereof. The lease was attached to the First Amended Complaint, but again defendants moved to dismiss, this time alleging the lack of the accompanying personal guarantee and the lack of a corporate seal. The lower court again dismissed the complaint, allowing plaintiff twenty days to amend. Thirteen days after this order was entered the plaintiff filed a "Motion for Rehearing," requesting the judge to articulate the grounds upon which the First Amended Complaint had been dismissed and offering case law on the issue of a defendant's personal liability on the lease. A hearing was held on this motion, resulting in a denial. Twelve days later the plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint. This time the defendants moved to dismiss on the basis that the Second Amended Complaint was filed more than twenty days after the trial court's order granting the motion to dismiss giving plaintiff twenty days to amend. This Second Amended Complaint was dismissed with prejudice and the plaintiff appeals both this and the dismissal of his First Amended Complaint. We reverse.

While a non-final order is not subject to a petition for rehearing, Hubert v. Division of Administration, State Department of Transportation, 425 So.2d 671 (Fla.2d DCA 1983), it is also true that a trial court has jurisdiction to control its own non-final orders prior to entry of final judgment. North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla.1962). Therefore, the trial court had the discretion to entertain a petition for rehearing if it chose to do so. It did so choose and thereby impliedly tolled the time for filing the Second Amended Complaint which was filed only twelve days after the court denied the petition for rehearing. Since the trial court initially determined that a Second Amended Complaint could be filed within twenty days of the dismissal of the First Amended Complaint, the Second Amended Complaint was timely filed, and the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing it.

The plaintiff also appeals the dismissal of his First Amended Complaint, the grounds for which as we have said were not set forth by the trial court. However, an original pleading is usually superseded by an amendment to it Rice v. Clement, 184 So.2d 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), so the merits of the dismissal of that First Amended Complaint are not before us. Notwithstanding, we perceive that upon remand these issues will again be considered below, so we make the following comments in the interest of judicial economy.

The Lease Agreement was signed:

The Success Academy, Inc.,

By: Lawrence D. Greer,

President

The Lease contained the following clause on p. 16:

SPECIAL CLAUSES:

1. In the event of default of this lease by The Success Academy, Inc., the terms and conditions herein shall be personally guaranteed by Lawrence D. Greer, President of The Success Academy, Inc.

In his First Amended Complaint plaintiff alleged in paragraph 6:

That the Defendant, LAWRENCE D. GREER, did, pursuant to the provision of the Lease as set forth on page 16 of said Lease agreed and promised in the event of default of this Lease by THE SUCCESS ACADEMY, that he was...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Baron Oil Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 12, 1985
    ...by an amendment of it which does not express an intention to save any portion of the original pleading. Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Rice v. Clement, 184 So.2d 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966); Shannon v. McBride, 105 So.2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)......
  • Raymond, James & Associates, Inc. v. Zumstorchen Inv., Ltd.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 16, 1986
    ...a complaint, the pleader causes the new complaint to become a substitute for the prior pleading. Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So.2d 934, 936 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. v. Vanguard Insurance Co., 400 So.2d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Rice v. Clemen......
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Miller, s. 95-1851
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 20, 1996
    ...court retains jurisdiction to control its own non-final orders prior to entry of final judgment, citing Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), and North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1962). Because the trial court had not ye......
  • Feigin v. Hospital Staffing Services, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 21, 1990
    ...complaint, this court need not address the dismissal of the fraud count in the original complaint. Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Furthermore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by failing to allow appellant to file a revised fo......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Reconsideration or rehearing: is there a difference?
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 83 No. 6, June 2009
    • June 1, 2009
    ...orders. In 1984, the Fourth District attempted to clarify this apparent contradiction in Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). The court held that while nonfinal orders were not subject to a motion for rehearing, a trial judge nevertheless had ......
  • Jumping the gun: premature appeals in civil cases.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 84 No. 3, March 2010
    • March 1, 2010
    ...& Assocs. v. Zumstorchen Invest., Ltd., 488 So. 2d 843, 844 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1986); Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Acad., Inc., 453 So. 2d 934, 936 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. (29) Hoffman, 817 So. 2d at 1058. (30) See, e.g., Hinote, 958 So. 2d at 1010. (31) See In re Amendments to Fla. Rules of......
  • Jurisdiction is jurisdiction: a warning to litigators.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 81 No. 4, April 2007
    • April 1, 2007
    ...notice of appeal); Smith v. Weede, 433 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 1983) (same). (15) Commercial Garden Mall v. Success Academy, Inc., 453 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1984). Courts and commentators have distinguished between the filing of a motion for "rehearing" which is improper, and a mo......