Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. Cecil B. De Mille Productions, 8144.

Decision Date16 April 1937
Docket NumberNo. 8144.,8144.
PartiesCOMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CECIL B. DE MILLE PRODUCTIONS, Inc.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, Thurman Arnold, and Carlton Fox, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and James D. Head and Charles E. Lowery, Sp. Attys., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Neil S. McCarthy and A. Calder Mackay, both of Los Angeles, Cal. (Thomas R. Dempsey, Earl L. Banta, and Howard W. Reynolds, all of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for respondent.

Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner has petitioned this court to review a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals determining that respondent was not liable for a deficiency in its tax returns for the years 1924 to 1929, inclusive.

Extended statement of facts is unnecessary. Cecil B. De Mille in 1913 joined three other men in organizing Lasky Feature Play Company. After formation the duty of Cecil B. De Mille was to produce pictures. The company prospered and later merged with other picture concerns to form Famous Players-Lasky Corporation. With the latter company De Mille's duties, generally, were the direction and production of pictures. Friction arose in the organization and De Mille in 1920 formed a partnership consisting of himself and three others. The partnership made pictures, and the earnings of the firm were used in making investments.

In 1922 the members of the firm organized a corporation, respondent herein, and conveyed the assets of the partnership to it in return for stock in respondent. The earnings of respondent were allowed to accumulate, as the Board stated "so that the company might be able to produce its own pictures."

The Revenue Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 277) provides:

"Sec. 220. (a) If any corporation, however created or organized, is formed or availed of for the purpose of preventing the imposition of the surtax upon its shareholders through the medium of permitting its gains and profits to accumulate instead of being divided or distributed, there shall be levied, collected, and paid for each taxable year upon the net income of such corporation a tax equal to 50 per centum of the amount thereof, which shall be in addition to the tax imposed by section 230 of this title and shall (except as provided in subdivision (d) of this section) be computed, collected, and paid upon the same basis and in the same manner and subject to the same provisions of law, including penalties, as that tax.

"(b) The fact that any corporation is a mere holding or investment company, or that the gains or profits are permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business, shall be prima facie evidence of a purpose to escape the surtax."

The Revenue Acts of 1926 and 1928 contain substantially identical provisions (44 Stat. 34, § 220 and 45 Stat. 814, § 104 (26 U.S.C.A. § 104 note).

Petitioner asserted a deficiency in respondent's tax, based upon the above statute. The surplus of respondent and the deficiencies asserted by petitioner for the years in question are as follows:

                  Year             Surplus             Deficiency
                  1924           $ 309,366.66         $ 95,956.06
                  1925             708,730.14          239,206.30
                  1926           1,136,129.30          275,632.56
                  1927           1,239,403.97           84,050.73
                  1928           1,568,477.56          477,056.45
                  1929           1,606,515.33           35,157.09
                

Respondent petitioned the Board to redetermine the liability. The Board found: "Cecil B. deMille Productions, Inc., was not formed, nor, during the years 1924 to 1929 inclusive, was it availed of for the purpose of preventing the imposition of surtaxes upon its shareholders through the medium of permitting its gains...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • World Pub. Co. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Oklahoma
    • May 16, 1947
    ...the consequence of the accumulation. Mertens, Federal Income Taxation, Sec. 40.08; DeMille v. Commissioner, 31 B.T.A. 1161, affirmed 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 12, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 713, 58 S.Ct. 32, 82 L.Ed. If there is an accumulation the purpose of preventing the imposition of a surtax upo......
  • Bride v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • August 1, 1955
    ...Cox v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 147 F.2d 60; Trico Products Corp. v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 137 F.2d 424; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Cecil B. deMille Productions, 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 12; Koma, Inc., v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 189 F.2d 390; Latchis Theatres of Keene v. Commissioner, 1 Cir., ......
  • Pelton Steel Casting Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Docket No. 50455.
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • April 25, 1957
    ...F.2d 487 (C.A. 5), certiorari denied 308 U.S. 576; C. H. Spitzner & Son, Inc., 37 B.T.A. 511; C. B. DeMille, 31 B.T.A. 1161 (1935), affd. 90 F.2d 12, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 713. The effect, however, is evidence of the purpose, because it may reasonably be inferred that the controlling i......
  • Chicago Stock Yards Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • July 24, 1942
    ...8 Cir., 1942, 125 F.2d 998, 1000; United Block Co. v. Helvering, 2 Cir., 1941, 123 F.2d 704; Commissioner v. Cecil B. De Mille Productions, Inc., 9 Cir., 1937, 90 F.2d 12. Nor is the rule any different, as petitioner contends, when the subsidiary facts are undisputed. Wilmington Trust Co. v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT