Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hindman, 6115.
Decision Date | 29 January 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 6115.,6115. |
Citation | 88 F.2d 44 |
Parties | COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HINDMAN. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Joseph M. Jones, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
William A. Seifert, William Wallace Booth, and Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent.
Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
The facts in this income tax case are correctly stated by the tax board in its findings, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. and to Use of Baumann v. Bowles
... ... of Georgia, 9 Wheat. 904; Biscoe v. Tax ... Commissioner, 236 Mass. 201, 128 N.E. 16; Blair v ... Mathews, 29 F.2d ... 152; Brush v ... Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 57 S.Ct. 495; ... Buffington, Collector v. Day, ... F.2d 660; Commr. of Internal Rev. v. Hindman, 88 ... F.2d 44; Commr. of Internal Rev. v. Modjeski, 75 ... ...
-
Howell v. Division of Employment Sec., Department of Labor & Indus. Relations of State
... ... C. A. 5th, 1931); ... Commissioner v. Hindman, 88 F.2d 44 (C. C. A. 3rd, ... 1937). Even if ... ...