Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Chandler

Decision Date12 April 1937
Docket NumberNo. 8262.,8262.
PartiesCOMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CHANDLER.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, John G. Remey, and Francis I. Howley, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

A. Calder Mackay, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Thomas R. Dempsey and John T. Riley, both of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for respondent.

Before WILBUR and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges, and NETERER, District Judge.

NETERER, District Judge.

This appeal involves income taxes for the year 1929 upon an order of redetermination of July 26, 1935, pursuant to the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1926, ch. 27, 44 Stat. 9, 109, 110, §§ 1001-1003, as amended by section 1101 of the Revenue Act of 1932, ch. 209, 47 Stat. 169, 286.

The findings of the Board of Tax Appeals are conclusive if sustained by substantial evidence. Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U.S. 589, 51 S.Ct. 608, 75 L. Ed. 1289; Helvering v. Rankin, 295 U.S. 123, 55 S.Ct. 732, 79 L.Ed. 1343; American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Burnet (C.C.A.9) 45 F.(2d) 548; Winnett v. Helvering, 68 F.(2d) 614, 615 (C.C.A.9), and Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 292 U.S. 282-287, 54 S.Ct. 692-694, 78 L.Ed. 1260.

The Board, supra, found that Harry Chandler in 1916 incorporated the Chandis Securities Corporation with a capital stock of 500 shares, $1,000 per share par value, in payment of which he transferred designated real and personal property. The stock was issued 200 shares to his wife, the respondent, and 280 shares to his children. Other properties were later transferred to the company in consideration for which the company issued its promissory note, which Chandler assigned to his wife and children in proportion to their stock holdings. No interest or principal was paid. On December 31, 1923, new notes for the principal and accrued interest were executed. The principal and interest of the new notes was due and payable December 31, 1929.

On October 14, 1929, by resolution of its Board of Directors, the corporation increased its capital stock to 50,000 shares of the par value of $100 per share. On December 18, 1929, said Board adopted a resolution containing recitals of its indebtedness to its stockholders in the aggregate principal sum of $2,640,598.21, evidenced by several promissory notes of the corporation, dated December 31, 1923, bearing interest at 5 per cent. per annum, compounded annually, on which no part had been paid, and recited the willingness of the said creditors, "and offer to accept stock" in the corporation at par value in full or part payment of their respective notes, together with interest, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Corporations of the state to issue to any and/or all of the said creditors in liquidation of the indebtedness, together with interest to the time of the issuance, full paid stock at its par value for the amount of the indebtedness so liquidated, and take and receive from the said creditors a cancellation and satisfaction of said notes to the extent that stock may be issued therefor, and it directed the president and secretary of the corporation to make application to the commissioner of corporations of the state of California for a permit to sell and/or issue to and/or among the creditors only, "and one other," 40,000 shares of the capital stock of said corporation, at par, either (a) for cash, lawful money of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • TABERY v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 13 de julho de 1964
    ...to indicate that a transfer of stock took place. For the same reasons, the case of Commissioner v. Chandler 37-1 USTC ¶ 9244, 89 F. 2d 332 (C. A. 9, 1937), affirming Dec. 8981 32 B. T. A. 720 (1935), cited by petitioner, is not applicable to the instant Petitioner next argues, if a sale is ......
  • Martin v. Chandis Securities Co., 9735.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 29 de maio de 1942
    ..."From no conceivable viewpoint does it appear to us that the involved transaction was consummated prior to 1930". Commissioner v. Chandler, 9 Cir., 89 F.2d 332, 333. After having given notice to the company, appellant issued a summons to the company and to appellee Downing as Assistant Secr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT