Commonwealth Ex Rel. City Of Portsmouth v. Portsmouth Gas Co
Decision Date | 15 June 1922 |
Citation | 112 S.E. 792 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH ex rel. CITY OF PORTSMOUTH. v. PORTSMOUTH GAS CO. |
Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
Error to Hustings Court of Portsmouth.
Information in the matter of quo warranto by the Commonwealth, on relation of the City of Portsmouth, against the Portsmouth Gas Company. Judgment for defendant on demurrer, and the relator brings error. Affirmed.
Mann & Tyler, of Norfolk, for plaintiff in error.
Goodrich Hatton, of Portsmouth, for defendant in error.
KELLY, P. The commonwealth of Virginia, at the relation of the city of Portsmouth, in April, 1918, filed in the hustings court of that city an information in the nature of a writ of quo warranto against the Portsmouth Gas Company, alleging that the company "from the 18th day of February, 1914, and ever since, has exercised the privilege or franchise not conferred upon it by law to use the streets, lanes and alleys ofthe city of Portsmouth, for the purpose of laying gas mains and pipes to distribute gas for public and private lighting and heating, and for power."
The respondent interposed a demurrer to the information, which was sustained, and thereupon, the plaintiff not desiring to amend, the court entered the order now under review, adjudging:
The material allegations of the information, other than as above set out, are as follows:
That Portsmouth was incorporated as a town by the Colonial Assembly in 1752, and as a city by the General Assembly in 1858.
That on September 6, 1853, the council of the town of Portsmouth passed the following resolution:
That on November 1, 1853, the town council by another resolution extended the time within which the gas works were to be commenced and completed, and also made certain alterations as to charges for and quality of gas to be furnished.
That the foregoing resolutions constitute all the formal corporate action by the municipality, except as hereinafter set out, giving consent of the corporate authorities for use by the gas company of the streets and alleys of the town.
That on the 17th day of May, 1911, "the Portsmouth Gas Company, recognizing that their corporate life and the rights therein granted would expire by limitation on the 19th day of February, 1914, applied to the State Corporation Commission of Virginia for the purpose of extending the charter of said corporation for a period without limit; and that in pursuance to said application the Corporation Commission of Virginia issued and certified to the Secretary of the Commonwealth an amendment to the charter of the said the Portsmouth Gas Company, extending its corporate life to a period without limit."
That the above-recited extension of the charter was procured by the company without compliance on its part with sections 124 and 125 of the Virginia Constitution of 1902.
That all the rights of the gas company in and to the use of the streets and alleys of the city not permitted to the general public ceased and determined on the 19th day of February, 1914, and that the action of the State Corporation Commission in granting an extension of the charter did not confer upon the company any rights in the streets and alleys not permitted to the public generally.
And, finally, that the gas company, by applying for and accepting the amendment to its charter on May 17, 1911,
The legal effect of the demurrer was to admit the facts but not the conclusions of law stated in the information, and upon the facts as alleged we are of opinion that the demurrer was properly sustained.
There has been no lapse or break in the corporate existence of the gas company since the date of its original incorporation, and the fact that the charter has twice been amended to avoid a forfeiture to which it otherwise would have been exposed is material here only in so far as the necessity for such amendments may bear upon a proper construction of the franchise granted to it by the municipality. And the same may be said as to the fact, stressed by counsel for the city, that the original franchise was granted to the company, and not in terms to its successors and assigns.
We do not understand that any serious question is raised before us as to the legislative authority of the town or city to grant a franchise for the use of its streets. There are some contrary expressions in the brief for the city, but the case has in the main been presented to us upon the apparent assumption that the authority existed. Such authority, of course, was necessary (Lile's Notes on Municipal Corporations [1922] § 58, and ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Alexandria Water Co. v. Alexandria
...water." Though its charter has been amended since the Constitution of 1902 was ordained, under the authority of Commonwealth Portsmouth Gas Co., 132 Va. 480, 112 S.E. 792, its franchise to occupy the public streets, etc., of the then town, now city of Alexandria, is a perpetual franchise, w......
-
Craddock-terry Co v. Powell
...of preferred stockholders. To read this meaning into the statute raises a serious constitutional question. See Commonwealth v. Portsmouth Gas Co., 132 Va. 480, 112 S.E. 792; Phillips, etc., Co. v. Jenkins, 297 U.S. 629, 56 S.Ct. 611, 80 L.Ed. 943; Coombes v. Getz, 285 U.S. 434, 52 S.Ct. 435......
-
Craddock-Terry Co. v. Powell, Record No. 2513.
...of preferred stockholders. To read this meaning into the statute raises a serious constitutional question. See Commonwealth Portsmouth Gas Co., 132 Va. 480, 112 S.E. 792; Phillips Petroleum Co. Jenkins, 297 U.S. 629, 56 S.Ct. 611, 80 L.Ed. 943; Coombes Getz, 285 U.S. 434, 52 S.Ct. 435, 76 L......
-
Lynchburg Traction & Light Co v. City Of Lynchburg
...v. Hampton R. Co., 102 Va. 803, 47 S. E. 839; Washington, etc., R. Co. v. Alexandria, 98 Va. 344, 36 S. E. 385; Commonwealth v. Portsmouth Gas Co., 132 Va. 480, 112 S. E. 792; Norfolk, etc., Traction Co. v. Norfolk, 115 Va. 169, 78 S. E. 545, Ann. Cas. 1914D, 1067; Danville v. Danville Ry. ......