Commonwealth ex rel. Klugh v. Lyter
Decision Date | 23 May 1894 |
Docket Number | 4 |
Citation | 162 Pa. 50,29 A. 352 |
Parties | Commonwealth ex rel. Klugh v. Lyter et al., Appellants |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Argued April 12, 1894
Appeal, No. 4, May T., 1894, by defendants, Isaac Lyter et al., Commissioners of Dauphin County, from order of C.P Dauphin Co., Sept. T., 1893, No. 224, awarding writ of peremptory mandamus in favor of plaintiff, Commonwealth ex rel. J. F. Klugh. Affirmed.
Petition for mandamus to compel issue of tax duplicates.
The case was heard on petition and answer. The court awarded a peremptory mandamus in the following opinion by MCPHERSON J.:
Errors assigned were in deciding (1) that mandamus would lie; (2) that the act was constitutional; (3) the decree, quoting it.
The judgment is affirmed.
Albert Millar and S. J. M. McCarrell, for appellants. -- Mandamus is not the proper remedy: Hefner v. Com., 28 Pa. 113; Com. v. Supervisors, 29 Pa. 121; Com. v. Canal Com., 2 Whart. 286; Com. v. Comrs., 6 Whart. 476; King v. Mayor, 2 T.R. 259; Rex v. Ward, 2 Stra. 894; King v. Harris, 3 Burr. 1422, 1423; Rex v. Bankes, 3 Burr. 1454; Com. v. Perkins, 7 Pa. 42.
The act of 1885 is unconstitutional: Bennett v. Hunt, 148 Pa. 257; Com. v. Sheckler, 1 Pa. C.C.R. 505; Com. v. Bitting, 2 Pa. C.C.R. 298; Keim v. Devitt, 3 Pa. C.C.R. 250; Hannick's Bond, 3 Pa. C.C.R. 254; Com. v. Lackawanna Co. Com'rs, 7 Pa. C.C.R. 173; Com. v. Swab, 8 Pa. C.C.R. 111; Evans v. Witmer, 4 Lanc. L.R. 105; Ruth's Ap., 10 W.N. 498; Evans v. Phillipi, 117 Pa. 226; Com. v. Com'rs, 1 S. & R. 382; Fritz v. Ry., 155 Pa. 472.
Lyman D. Gilbert, Edgar L. King and John H. Weiss with him, for appellee. -- The act of June 25, 1885, is constitutional so far as it relates to the collection of state and county taxes in the township of Swatara: Evans v. Phillipi, 117 Pa. 226; Bennett v. Hunt, 148 Pa. 257; Monongahela Navigation Co. v. Coons, 6 W. & S. 114; Howard Assn.'s Ap., 70 Pa. 344; Blood v Marcelliott, 53 Pa. 391; Church Street, 54 Pa. 353; Com. v. Green, 58 Pa. 226; Allegheny Co. Home's Ap., 77 Pa. 77; ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Commonwealth v. Kline
...statement of questions involved (Keck v. Vandyke, 292 Pa. 532, 141 A. 446), and the point is no longer an open one (Comm. ex rel. v. Lyter, 162 Pa. 50, 29 A. 352; Comm. ex rel. v. Duquesne Borough School Dist., 256 Pa. 50, 100 A. 584). (2) The township treasurer, though holding the office, ......
-
Commonwealth ex rel. Schweyer v. Wunch
... ... Pa. 200; Morrison v. Fayette Co., 127 Pa. 110 ... C. H ... Ruhl of Ermentrout & Ruhl, for appellee, cited: Com. v ... Lyter, 162 Pa. 50; Endlich on Interpretation of ... Statutes, sec. 31; Quinn v. Cumberland County, 162 ... Pa. 55; Com. v. Braughler, 165 Pa. 284; Com ... ...
-
Keator v. Lackawanna County
...collection. Evans v. Phillipi, 117 Pa. 226, 11 A. 630, 2 Am. St. Rep. 655; Bennett v. Hunt. 148 Pa. 257, 23 A. 1121; Commonwealth v. Lyter, 162 Pa. 50, 29 A. 352; Swatara Tp. School District's Appeal, 1 Pa. Super. Ct. 502; Cornman v. Hagginbotham, 227 Pa. 549, 76 A. 721. While the particula......
-
Commonwealth ex rel. Raker v. Kline
...v. Higginbotham, 227 Pa. 549; McKeown's Petition, 237 Pa. 626. Appellee has right to mandamus: Com. v. School Dist., 256 Pa. 50; Com. v. Lyter, 162 Pa. 50; Com. v. Wilkins, Pa. 523. Before MOSCHZISKER, C.J., FRAZER, WALLING, SIMPSON, KEPHART, SADLER and SCHAFFER, JJ. OPINION MR. JUSTICE SIM......