Commonwealth v. Billingsley
Decision Date | 29 July 1947 |
Citation | 357 Pa. 378,54 A.2d 705 |
Parties | Commonwealth v. Billingsley, Appellant |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Argued May 26, 1947
Appeal, No. 115, March T., 1947, from judgment of Superior Court, April T., 1947, No. 97, affirming judgment of Q.S., Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1943, No. 4, in case of Commonwealth v. James W. Billingsley. Judgment affirmed; reargument refused September 30, 1947.
Same case below: 160 Pa.Super. 140.
Indictment charging defendant with attempted subornation of perjury. Before McDONALD, J.
Verdict of guilty and judgment of sentence thereon. Defendant appealed to the Superior Court which affirmed the judgment of the court below. Appeal by defendant to Supreme Court allowed.
The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed on the opinion of Judge ARNOLD.
Harry A. Estep , with him Harry I. Glick , for appellant.
J. E. Kalson , Assistant District Attorney, with him Artemas C. Leslie , District Attorney, for appellee.
Before MAXEY, C.J., DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON and STEARNE, JJ.
The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed on the opinion of Judge ARNOLD.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Rappaport
...the word 'conviction'. State v. Spurr, 100 W.Va. 121, 130 S.E. 81; Burnett v. State, 83 Tex.Cr.R. 97, 201 S.W. 409; Commonwealth v. Billingsley, 357 Pa. 378, 54 A.2d 705. The State contends that People v. Fabian, supra, has no effect in this case because, unlike the Fabian case, the appelle......