Commonwealth v. Clark
| Decision Date | 27 February 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 478 MAL 2006.,478 MAL 2006. |
| Citation | 942 A.2d 895 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Henry CLARK, Respondent. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case REMANDED to the trial court for reinstatement of the jury's verdict. See Commonwealth v. Ratsamy, 934 A.2d 1233 (Pa.2007).
Jurisdiction relinquished.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
In re R.N., No. 1572 MDA 2007.
...must not disregard that opinion or reweigh the evidence. Ratsamy, 934 A.2d at 1236. ¶ 10 Although Appellant cites Commonwealth v. Clark, 895 A.2d 633 (Pa.Super.2006), to support his position that the evidence was insufficient to prove PWID, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court vacated our Court's......
-
Com. v. Carpenter
...955 A.2d 411 ... 2008 PA Super 186 ... COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee ... Henry CARPENTER, Appellant ... No. 1521 MDA 2007 ... Superior Court of Pennsylvania ... Submitted March 10, 2008 ... ¶ 13 Likewise, the Supreme Court also recently vacated the other case Carpenter relied on, Commonwealth v. Clark, ___ Pa. ___, 942 A.2d 895 (2008), pursuant to Ratsamy. In that case, the testimony of the expert witness established that the defendant possessed ... ...
-
Commonwealth v. Hampton
...purely speculative and contrary to Appellant's own testimony that he is a heavy drug user. Id. Moreover, relying on Commonwealth v. Clark, 895 A.2d 633 (Pa. Super. 2006) and Commonwealth v. Ratsamy, 885 A.2d 1005 (Pa. Super. 2005), Appellant notes that even if he did possess the statutory a......